How to Analyze position Scientifically (part-2,Identification)

Sort:
devtaji

Nice explaination but any player with a little experience follows this algorithm subconciously.

mosai

Why is this scientific?

Earth64
stuzzicadenti wrote:

this looks like a great way to lose games on time

If you have any shortcut way to be succeded, then share it please.
Power of short games comes from long game, long thinking and experiance.
If you ask any expert , they will say the same thing.

Earth64
Crazy_Assassin wrote:

K sir.. you mean we can use it in otb games with long time control.

yes, of course. Please read my part -3, it will be more easier to understand.

The original works of this algorithm are more complex, i presented it here for normal user.

Without complete visualization , you can not do well in puzzle solving.


Earth64
devtaji wrote:

Nice explaination but any player with a little experience follows this algorithm subconciously.

you need to practise it and you can optimize it acoording to your positional need and COMFORT.

Earth64
mosai wrote:

Why is this scientific?

The idea comes from an original scientific work and it does follow all necessary steps to become

  •  Complete
  •  Accurate
  •  Easy
  •  Quick

Crazy_Assassin

K sir..

kleelof
Earth64 wrote:

@ Tide, i say it is the scientific step like math and language which is complete and accurate.

When you speak you do not think about letter ,word and grammar but do it in subconscious mind;  and the conscious mind focus on overall outline and purpose.

This is a clever response to this concern.

What the OP is talking about here explains why, if you really want to improve your overall chess skills, slow time controls are very important. You need that extra time to 'train' your thinking process.

A year ago, when I tried to play 15 minute games, I was in a panic most of the time with hardly any idea of how to deal with different situations.

Then I started playing 3 day/move games. In these games, I am able to follow a system for evaluating a position at my own pace. After a few months of this, I found myself doing some of the system in my blitz games.

It's like playing a guitar. When you first start, you have to think about things such as finger placement, strumming, picking, tempo, tune and several other things. And, accordingly, when you first start playing guitar, you play very slowly because you have to actually think about these things. But, of course, once you have practiced slowly for a while, you can play faster because these things become almost subconscious.

I_Am_Second

Regarding your example...why not just play forcing moves?

Crazy_Assassin

Sir I have my own way of thinking while solving, but will love to learn from you cos I am very weak in making plans.. as a beginner I think my tactic rating point here is very good.

justus_jep
I_Am_Second wrote:

Regarding your example...why not just play forcing moves?

 

Easier said than done. The problem is that I see forcing moves everywhere and threats that don't exist.(eg: in the example i was looking at Nc3 then I took the hanging bishop ) Innocent 

Earth64
Crazy_Assassin wrote:

Sir I have my own way of thinking while solving, but will love to learn from you cos I am very weak in making plans.. as a beginner I think my tactic rating point here is very good.

 
Your Rating :
2005
 Your attempts :
815

  Not so bad but best of all

GM Natalia pogonina2877

Is  she worse than you?

FM Eylisium
: 1670

 # GM Hikaru: 2972



Mine:

Earth64

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-to-calculate-tactics-scientifically-part-3

Earth64

Third part is out.

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-to-calculate-tactics-scientifically-part-3

Crazy_Assassin

Thanks sir.

mosai

The real subconcious mind doesn't work like a computer. Calculation is powered by pattern recognition and guided by your accumulated cognitions on the position.

Earth64
mosai wrote:

The real subconcious mind doesn't work like a computer. Calculation is powered by pattern recognition and guided by your accumulated cognitions on the position.

ur words say that u r not blessed with some more ordinary thinking power.
To understand my words it doesn not need any xtra ordinary thinking skill

Earth64

Read previous part:

 http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-to-analyze-position-scientifically-part-1

Earth64

'power '   instead of 'more'

mosai

I hope for your sake that you are a kid