I don't understand how is possible that someone who has a double major waste time with chess. But I guess that's one of the reason why US is going bad, if their youth prefer to waste time in a game, instead of studying, and eventually give a contribution to the future of the country, like millions of Chinese or Indians are doing.
I respect chess as a sport, and of course respect those who have made of chess a life, like GMs or other professional coaches. But in your position, with your IQ, try to do something in your country, which is more valuable than pushing wood. Notice that my opinion is supported also by smarter people, with higher IQs, an example was Einstein, that couldn't understand why his friend Lasker would waste time playing chess.
However to tell you what you came asking for: you need to devote the next 10 years, (if you want to avoid hanging pieces, and learn how to win also with just one pawn advantage in for example a rook endgame), to study chess. Still there are master level players who get checkmated or hang pieces, just look the face of Wang Hao (2700 rated player) when Kosteniuk gave him checkmate. Or as personal experience I have won a game to a 2300 player (in tournament) thanks to him getting distracted, and make a bad blunder, and he is quite strong.
Hello!
I first picked up a chess piece about two months ago. One of my friends was teaching me how to play. At first I was a little worried that I wasn't going to enjoy myself playing. I thought that it was an antiquated game, that other more modern games would more suit my desire for strategy and tactics. I've never been so wrong. I immediately fell in love with the game, but in such a short time playing, and an even shorter time on Chess.com, I've been so overwhelmed by the masses of information about everything related to chess. I am looking for help from you, the more experienced chess players.
A little background on myself, I'm a college student, attending Montana State University on a double major. I have an IQ of about 140, but I often let most of it go to waste out of apathy or boredom. Chess really lets me let my brain run, and I love it. As such, I really want to get to the level of playing that this game deserves.
I don't want to become any sort of master, or win tournaments, or anything like that. I simply want to get to the level in which chess is played how it's supposed to be played. I want to be at the level where winning a pawn is actually relevant to the outcome of the game. I want to get to the point where I don't slip full piece leads. I want to get to the point where whoever wins or loses is the one who plays the best game throughout, not whoever makes the game ending blunder with a lead. I want to be at the level where chess is played how it is meant to be played, where it's an art and a .2 point increase due to position is a big deal.
So, please, if you have any tips for me as far as what to do to improve to that level, I'd love to hear them! Some things I've been doing are playing a lot (obviously a big one) and a little bit of tactics training. What else should I be doing? I don't have the money for a coach, so that's not really an option for me, but any little strategies to improve someone might be holding onto would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!