To HELL with the dark side
How To Remove Not Needed Points
Sort:
Dec 1, 2017
0
#27
I have suffered for 16 years so are you saying such suffering brings such anger, or perhaps such anger is to END SUCH SUFFERING
Dec 1, 2017
0
#28
The only patience I need toward's you is to patiently wait your reply by creating another account due you blocked this username.
Dec 1, 2017
0
#29
Insane experience.
Dude just created his account today too.
You would have thought before I had him blocked he would have shared such his higher call, purpose.
Dec 2, 2017
0
#30
wanmokewan wrote:
Lovely. *sigh*
Yes... post #5 already replied to your statement, but there's a few more videos I truly wish you to see. Like Operation Fishbowl, and a great one by Rob Skiba his part 2 of Biblical Flat Earth Conference in Amsterdam. (Note to Moderators: there's no discussion here we're having on religion, it's a video)
^^^^ Notice how @ 0:22 ^^^^ the light of the impact (in 1962) lighten's up what looks like they had earlier other impacts creating what very much looks like cracks from such.
Published on Feb 23, 2017
Dec 3, 2017
0
#32
Dec 3, 2017
0
#33
02:28 LMAO If there's thousands of satellites around the fake globe lol then why the hell are they showing in animation? & 03:21 lol Try At Home..
Published on Jun 17, 2016
Dec 4, 2017
0
#35
2STONE2 wrote:
This video has been circulating online since at least August 2015 and is one of several clips purportedly showing Kubrick talking about his alleged involvement in faking the U.S. moon landings. While there are various edits of this infamous (and fake) interview circulating on YouTube, the videos all originated with a new film from T. Patrick Murray titled Shooting Kubrick.
Murray claimed on the Shooting Kubrick web site that he was granted unprecedented access to interview the director in May 1999, which would have been quite an impressive feat since Kubrick had passed away two months earlier.
Although the date could be a simple typographical error, that was not the only questionable aspect of the interview. The man being interviewed simply doesn’t look or sound like Stanley Kubrick when compared to a video of the real Kubrick accepting the D.W. Griffith Award in 1997:
Furthermore, unedited versions of the interview contain hints that the “Stanley Kubrick” in the video is an actor. At the 14-minute mark of the clip shown below, the interviewer calls his subject “Tom” and then proceeds to instruct him on how to tell the next part of his story:
“You don’t say he said anything. You say what he says. Tom, I’m giving you directions. You don’t have to imitate him (Richard Nixon). You’re not reporting it. You’re repeating it … We’re doing exposition here. That’s how we’re going to sneak it in.”
A spokesman for Kubrick’s widow also proclaimed that “The interview is a lie, Stanley Kubrick has never been interviewed by T.Patrick Murray the whole story is made up, fraudulent and untrue.”
T. Patrick Murray has not admitted that his interview with Stanley Kubrick is a hoax, but he certainly is banking the mystery’s driving interest in his project:
https://www.snopes.com/false-stanley-kubrick-faked-moon-landings/
Dec 15, 2017
0
#36
why O why would you call me such? Because my heart wishing others free from the @ HOLES that have deceived millions and millions for a RATHER VERY LONG TIME?