Howard Staunton, on Knights

Sort:
gregpkennedy
From "The Blue Book of Chess":
"Concerning the Knight.—The Knight is at once the most striking and most beautiful of all the Pieces. The singularity of its evolutions, by which it is enabled to overleap the other men and wind its way into the penetralia of the adverse ranks, and if attacked leap back again within the boundary of its own, has rendered it the favorite Piece of leading players in every country."
"At the commencement of a game, the best place for the King's Knight is at K. B's 3d sq.; it there attacks your adversary's K's Pawn, if it has been moved two squares, and offers no impediment to the playing out your King's Bishop, and prevents the adversary from placing his Queen on your King Rook's 4th sq., where she would often be a source of restraint and danger to your King. Many persons prefer playing the K. Kt. to K's 2d at the second move, from the mistaken notion that the K. B's P.should be moved before the Knight is played to B's 3d; this is an error, and generally leads to a very bad game."
 
 
 
"When you have brought out your Q. Kt. to B's 3d, it is frequently advisable, at a proper opportunity, to get him round by K's 2d sq. to the K. Kt's 3d, where he exercises a very important influence, by threatening, whenever the square is left unguarded, to post himself on K. B's 5th."
 
 
gregpkennedy

I have to say, though, that I'm not clear on why Nf5 is considered such a valuable move.  Staunton pretty much expects that your opponent has castled kingside by the time this move can be made safely, which means Ne7 could theoretically set up a fork, or Qxg7 could somehow be arranged. Still, the N must make such a long, meandering journey to get over there that there must be something more valuable I'm missing if it really is that worthwhile.