I am the worst 2000 rated player of all time
Sort:
You should never accuse anyone of being a cheat on chess.com even though their rating profile states otherwise, therefore I’m not saying anything.
False. He accused me of being an engine user which is nonsense. All I did was debunk his argument and then gave detailed examples of the several times other users have posted in threads that he is an engine using cheat.
Sep 20, 2018
0
#24
I think I am the worst 2000 player in chess.com. I have never read any chess book, If someone say Qf3 I do not know where is it unless I look at the board BECAUSE i DID NOT MEMORIZE the places. I never play rapid chess, I have never played in any chess club, I don`t analyze my games and did not memorize any theory, but I watch many YouTube chess channels like Gingergm an IM John Bartholomew. I think if I analyse my game using engine and study some opening I may gain 100 points of rating easily. my best results was 4-4 against FM player in chess24 website.
Faby_AZ wrote:
I think I am the worst 2000 player in chess.com. I have never read any chess book, If someone say Qf3 I do not know where is it unless I look at the board BECAUSE i DID NOT MEMORIZE the places. I never play rapid chess, I have never played in any chess club, I don`t analyze my games and did not memorize any theory, but I watch many YouTube chess channels like Gingergm an IM John Bartholomew. I think if I analyse my game using engine and study some opening I may gain 100 points of rating easily. my best results was 4-4 against FM player in chess24 website.
Hahahaha I like this guy
Sep 20, 2018
0
#26
Faby_AZ wrote:
I think I am the worst 2000 player in chess.com. I have never read any chess book, If someone say Qf3 I do not know where is it unless I look at the board BECAUSE i DID NOT MEMORIZE the places. I never play rapid chess, I have never played in any chess club, I don`t analyze my games and did not memorize any theory, but I watch many YouTube chess channels like Gingergm an IM John Bartholomew. I think if I analyse my game using engine and study some opening I may gain 100 points of rating easily. my best results was 4-4 against FM player in chess24 website.
Ok, so you and staples need to play a match to find out who is really the worst lol 
Also, I think it would be fun to play a match (I'll play whoever) where we use the time controls like in the chess.com speed championship.
I'm not going to say it correctly, but it's something like an hour or two of 5/1 then an hour of 3/1 then maybe an hour of 1/1.
Does that mean you’re staking your claim as the worst 2000 rated player of all time as well Farm-Hand?
Sep 20, 2018
0
#28
Btw, nobody outside of the site (regardless of the site) takes online ratings seriously.
If you want to impress your OTB friends, become the weakest +2000 OTB player.
Sep 20, 2018
0
#29
SmyslovFan wrote:
If you want to impress your OTB friends, become the weakest +2000 OTB player.
lol
Sep 20, 2018
0
#30
staples13 wrote:
Does that mean you’re staking your claim as the worst 2000 rated player of all time as well Farm-Hand?
Sure.
But really, I was watching some of Giri Aronian today and I thought that format might be fun.
We could even do it unrated (or whoever wants to play me).
I mean... not right now, I'm about to sleep, but maybe in a few days?
Sep 20, 2018
0
#31
Farm_Hand wrote:
Ok, so you and staples need to play a match to find out who is really the worst lol
I hate these one-down's-manship contests...
Sep 21, 2018
0
#32
@Farm_Hand for the speed chess championship it is 90 minutes+60minutes+30 minutes
How have you not been banned for sandbagging yet
Well for starters because sandbagging is allowed
So nobody really cares
Hey Farm_Hand (aka Preg*********), do you want to play unrated with me? I know that you will look at my rating and go, NO!, but I need the practise, and on seconds thoughts, let’s make it rated. That way, you can lose tons of points if I win, and since your account is pretty new, you’d probably gain a few points even if you beat me. Wait...do you want to lose rating points? Anyway, rated or not, I really need the coaching,
Post where it says that in the fair play policy
BobbyTalparov wrote:
staples13 wrote:
Post where it says that in the fair play policy
https://support.chess.com/customer/en/portal/articles/1444879-fair-play-on-chess-com-what-you-need-to-know
The portion you'll care about is:
- Fixing game results by playing with multiple accounts or losing intentionally is also against the rules.
(emphasis mine)
You'll also want to pay attention to the next section in the policy (since you have spent a good deal of time over the last few days violating that as well).
Damn you just hit him with that mic drop
No that’s not how I interpret that at all. It says that match fixing by intentionally losing doing so isn’t allowed.
match fixing would be if I were intentionally trying to help someone win a tournament or increase their rating by fixing a match with them where I purposely lose. I can resign as many of my games as I want
Wrong on the second point too. I didn’t attack Allusernamestaken all I did was defend myself against his vicious out of the blue attacks for no reason. I hadn’t even said anything to him. All I did was point out the many games that have been posted on various threads by other users where they noticed that he used an engine. Others pointed out that he used an engine, I just made everyone aware of that
2000 on this site is a joke
very overinflated blitz rating pool here.