I am UNMATEABLE!!!

Sort:
cheater_1

zerrogi, Larry Christiansen was the best game of the three GMs that I played. The others were quick resignations--which I despise. It WAS Larry because at the site, a very credible site, the famous ones get a special marker by their name, etc. I was a "GM" using a stolen USCF identity and on a free 14 day trial period.

True, I didn't use Cannibal back then. I didn't trust it. Fritz was a better, stronger program.

Chess.com tolerates me to an extent because in my over 1 year here, I have only played 2 chess games, and both of them it is made KNOWN that I will be playing computer aided chess. No masquerading anymore.

As for a copy of the game, I have never made it public, other than when it actually happened over 10 years ago. I'll think about it.

Baseballfan
Zabuza wrote:

 Pictures, or it did not happen. What was the site? Your former user-name? Would they back you up if I were to go and ask them of this? Surely they would not forget.

If there were 120 people watching, there are 122 witnesses. I think they would still remember.

Next time you fake a story, be sure to put in the part where "the site crashed/was cancelled/destroyed for some reason." That, or provide sources. None of this "it's confidential" crap.


He won't... because he  does not expect himself to adhere to the same guidelines he wants us to adhere to. If someone else posted that story, he would DEMAND proof, or that the person cite their sources, or some such nonesense, but those are rules for US, not him. He is (apparently) free to say whatever he wants, and we are supposed to accept it as gospel...

Zabuza
Baseballfan wrote:

He won't... because he  does not expect himself to adhere to the same guidelines he wants us to adhere to. If someone else posted that story, he would DEMAND proof, or that the person cite their sources, or some such nonesense, but those are rules for US, not him. He is (apparently) free to say whatever he wants, and we are supposed to accept it as gospel...


 This is no excuse. The troll has left his cave; it is time for him to appease the populace.

This event is a lie until some form of proof is brought forward.

cheater_1

Hey Zabuza, I'm sure Larry lost a lot of sleep over the months on that one. I'm sure he ran it through fritz over and over. I'm sure it ate him up. I know it did.

Do you think I'm stupid? I PURPOSELY am withholding info. Many Ne'er-do-wells have been caught by a paper trail. What, you want my real name and phone number too? Come on, I didn't just fall off the turnip truck.

My past is a tangled mess. I have won money by cheating at chess. Not a lot, but enough to attract attention. I give just enough info to rehash the past...to ressurect it. I don't want my past accomplishments to pass into legend. I'm sure the statute of limitations has expired on any laws that may or may not have been broken, but I must play it safe.

I like to walk the razor's edge. I like the challenge of painting myself in a corner and then using my skills to get myself out. That's why I reveal things that may not be on the up and up. It's cat and mouse. Catch me if you can. I get off on proving that I'm smarter than the establishment. This instance of me trouncing Larry, in and of itself, is not illegal, but it's the others where I actually won a prize (using a chess program to do it) where I signed a document stating what was legal and was was not.

Zerrogi
cheater_1 wrote:

zerrogi, Larry Christiansen was the best game of the three GMs that I played. The others were quick resignations--which I despise. It WAS Larry because at the site, a very credible site, the famous ones get a special marker by their name, etc. I was a "GM" using a stolen USCF identity and on a free 14 day trial period.

True, I didn't use Cannibal back then. I didn't trust it. Fritz was a better, stronger program.

Chess.com tolerates me to an extent because in my over 1 year here, I have only played 2 chess games, and both of them it is made KNOWN that I will be playing computer aided chess. No masquerading anymore.

As for a copy of the game, I have never made it public, other than when it actually happened over 10 years ago. I'll think about it.


I'm going to have to go with Zubasa and BaseBallFan on this one.  Defeating a GM like Christianson requires a decent amount of proof; not even mentioning the site's name is a little odd.  I didn't exactly clarify my point of why I pointed out you used Fritz, but so you understand now, according to your story(maybe stories) you haven't tested Cannibal yet against a decent GM.  This is why I seriously doubt its ability to defeat Anand.

cheater_1

Well, I didn't state the web site's name for two reasons. One, believe it or not, was respect for THIS site. I have seen ERIK on COUNTLESS occassions express his displeasure when people talk about the competition.

The second reason is this. I WILL SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU PEOPLE. LISTEN TO ME NOW!!!!! When I was on the unnamed chess website, I had to set up a free account. Back in the mid/late 90's, I was not as "wanted" or high profile as I am now. Plus, I was a bit STOOPIDER back then. I used a LEGITIMATE email account that was tied to some "sensitive" info. REAL INFO, DUH.

Let me break it down for you dunderheads. I'm sure you all have seen the documentaries where some big time felon gets arrested 20 years after his crime because he got lazy and slipped up. Well, suppose I reveal the website, the exact year, post the moves of the game, etc. Say someone on this site forwards it to the chess web site hoping to get me into trouble--kinda like calling into America's Most Wanted. I'm sure the website has a database of all the prizes it has awarded in the past. It crosschecks all the info that you want ME to provide, and it sees that yes, the same person that beat Larry, and two other GMs also won a toaster, a rubik's cube, and a pair of Nike shoes. Well, well, well. It seems we have this person's personal info right here. We'll just send someone over to question him and see if we can get the toaster, rubik's cube, and shoes returned to us. Now see, I HATE authority. I despise law enforcement officers and the like. I wouldn't put it past myself to sneak out the back door with my crossbow and my EYECLOPS nightvision goggles on. See the mess that this could turn into?

So, if you all must think I am lying...SO BE IT. You are not getting any more info out of me. You ruined it for yourselves.

hint: in the future, play hard to get and you actually might get what you want.

jcoby

What an idiot. If you believe you are really unmateable try this one, it's a classic:

Get a gallon of gasoline, pour all over you, light a zippo and set yourself on fire. Chances are you will get a draw...

augustaledford
cheater_1 wrote:all depends on perspective

Fellow chess freaks. I have decided that you have EARNED another post from me. Many people here are taking my advice and posting CREDIBLE posts. The lies have been dwindling. I have been noticing alot of CITATIONS from credible sources when you all decide to post something that cannot be taken for granted. Good job. Here is your reward.

Please refer to The Big Showdown group vote chess match between Team cheater_1 and Light Force as I will be using it to back up my claims. Team Lightforce was the only team on this site that had the courage to go toe to toe with me, so please give them a hand.

As you all know, I possess chess skills that far exceed even ANAND. I can hear you all laughing now, but it is true. If ANAND were to sit across from cheater_1 and his UNMATEABLE program CANNIBAL 37, he would LOSE. As you all know, in my nearly 1 million online games, I have never been checkmated once and have beaten 3 GMs in my life, and the GM games were 40/120. LEGIT TOURNEY GAMES.

Now, listen up. I am not making the claim that I will never lose a game on time, or take a loss because I was FORCED to resign as I was in our first vote chess game by team chess.com (bullies that they are). I am saying that I simply cannot be checkmated in a game of chess by any HUMAN, team of humans, computer program, team of computer programs, or any combination of the previous.

As many long time members of this site know, I employ my own chess knowledge (1950 uscf with 30 years of playing the game), A super chess program that I wrote that knows how to draw even the toughest of opponents (it's win percentage is 3% its loss percentage is ZERO%, and its draw percentage is 97%), and an extensive understanding of psychology that allows me to manipulate my opponents. Combine these elements and you have me...THE UNMATEABLE ONE.

Please refer to The Big Showdown now. Look at the board. Do you all remember my number one chess COMMANDMENT? ATTACK THE CENTER NO MATTER WHAT IS HAPPENING TO YOU. Ignore attacks on your pieces elsewhere. DO NOT defend in ANY circumstance unless there is a check upon you. Look at my pieces PUNISHING the center. Look at how my king is running about without a care. I am dividing and conquering. Look at my development, it is like a spear pointing at their heart. Look at my IMPENETRABLE pawn wall. I dont care a hoot about his king. Going for the king is not what it's about.....at this point.

Now, Team lightforce is no slouch. Last I heard there were dozens of people on that team, many running deep fritz and rybka. Look at how just little old me and my homemade program LURED them in. Like a spider luring an ant. They want my king so bad that they and their "commercial" chess programs couldn't see what I had in store for them. Do you see it? They just LOST their rook when I get my turn. I am attacking the Queen AND the ROOK. Too bad I'm not planning on going on vacation so you can DENY me a vacation and take the "win" like team chess.com did. SORRY.

17 moves into the game and it's all but OVER. DOZENS of top notch computer programs couldnt manage to pull off even a draw with me. Heck, my win percentage may go from 3% to 3.5% now.

Remember my rules. NEVER DEFEND, The top chess players in the world were NEVER known for their defensive playing. Develop your pieces toward the center, or at least have them attacking central squares. The fianchetto is more often than not the kiss of death when developing pieces. Push to the center, good things will happen. King safety is overrated. Use the king as bait. Bring him into the fight and gain an advantage.

I suspect team lightforce will resign shortly. When they do, is there any TEAM out there that has the GUTS to go toe to toe with the UNMATEABLE ONE?


LydiaBlonde

Cheater One: Of course, Mother's are always right. I admitted my faults and backed down. Someone has to wash my dirty underwear every other weekend, so I have keep on good terms with Momma.

I love you even more now, honey! My relation wiht my mama is similar! Tongue out

brandonQDSH

dratsab if you challenged cheater_1 with rybka the game would probably end in a DRAW because he is probably using the exact same program you are. forget about proving whether or not cheater_1's games with GMs are real. the guy won't even CITE one source in order to prove the validity of cannibal! if you ask me, and a lot of other people here, cannibal is about as real as a purple unicorn.

Zabuza
cheater_1 wrote:

Well, I didn't state the web site's name for two reasons. One, believe it or not, was respect for THIS site. I have seen ERIK on COUNTLESS occassions express his displeasure when people talk about the competition.

The second reason is this. I WILL SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU PEOPLE. LISTEN TO ME NOW!!!!! When I was on the unnamed chess website, I had to set up a free account. Back in the mid/late 90's, I was not as "wanted" or high profile as I am now. Plus, I was a bit STOOPIDER back then. I used a LEGITIMATE email account that was tied to some "sensitive" info. REAL INFO, DUH.

Let me break it down for you dunderheads. I'm sure you all have seen the documentaries where some big time felon gets arrested 20 years after his crime because he got lazy and slipped up. Well, suppose I reveal the website, the exact year, post the moves of the game, etc. Say someone on this site forwards it to the chess web site hoping to get me into trouble--kinda like calling into America's Most Wanted. I'm sure the website has a database of all the prizes it has awarded in the past. It crosschecks all the info that you want ME to provide, and it sees that yes, the same person that beat Larry, and two other GMs also won a toaster, a rubik's cube, and a pair of Nike shoes. Well, well, well. It seems we have this person's personal info right here. We'll just send someone over to question him and see if we can get the toaster, rubik's cube, and shoes returned to us. Now see, I HATE authority. I despise law enforcement officers and the like. I wouldn't put it past myself to sneak out the back door with my crossbow and my EYECLOPS nightvision goggles on. See the mess that this could turn into?

So, if you all must think I am lying...SO BE IT. You are not getting any more info out of me. You ruined it for yourselves.

hint: in the future, play hard to get and you actually might get what you want.


 The last thing you've shown for this site is respect. Contempt for the members, disdain in how you treat people, cheating via use of an engine, resignation in favor of checkmate so that you can uphold a foolish claim.

What you fail to realize is the intricacy of how the internet works. As soon as you registered on that site, your IP was recorded. Even if you've switched locations, even if you've switched emails, hell, even if you've switched computers, that data is registered with them. If they truly wished to prosecute you, the IP would be forwarded to the authorities and you'd have the cops knocking on your door the next whenever. If your paper trail was so easy to follow, then they already have what they need.

You, sir, are the only one who has ruined anything. Further and further you slide into a situation where no one respects you sans LydiaBlonde. A false story such as this is reprehensible; you claim victory over someone who is a professional, yet your story is riddled with more holes then a wheel of Swiss cheese. If your account was banned, as you claim, then there would be no way of accessing your email/information tied to that site. Furthermore, the fact that you managed to "impersonate" a GM, an act which would have surely called for a background check or verification, is unlikely bordering on the impossible. You use this forum as an avenue to release personal frustrations; perhaps your real life is unbearable. That is not my concern.

The fact is, this story is a fairy tail. Chess is not religion; we do not have faith. Evidence must be provided for wild claims. Even the chess engine you claim to have created, Cannibal 37, has no evidence to support its existance outside of claims made on chess.com. I have verified this with several searches on various sources that I have.

Why is it you have the courage to act high and mighty on a chess website, yet the thought of real information leaking seems to terrify you?

Mainline_Novelty
cheater_1 wrote:

Fellow chess freaks. I have decided that you have EARNED another post from me. Many people here are taking my advice and posting CREDIBLE posts. The lies have been dwindling. I have been noticing alot of CITATIONS from credible sources when you all decide to post something that cannot be taken for granted. Good job. Here is your reward.

Please refer to The Big Showdown group vote chess match between Team cheater_1 and Light Force as I will be using it to back up my claims. Team Lightforce was the only team on this site that had the courage to go toe to toe with me, so please give them a hand.

As you all know, I possess chess skills that far exceed even ANAND. I can hear you all laughing now, but it is true. If ANAND were to sit across from cheater_1 and his UNMATEABLE program CANNIBAL 37, he would LOSE. As you all know, in my nearly 1 million online games, I have never been checkmated once and have beaten 3 GMs in my life, and the GM games were 40/120. LEGIT TOURNEY GAMES.

Now, listen up. I am not making the claim that I will never lose a game on time, or take a loss because I was FORCED to resign as I was in our first vote chess game by team chess.com (bullies that they are). I am saying that I simply cannot be checkmated in a game of chess by any HUMAN, team of humans, computer program, team of computer programs, or any combination of the previous.

As many long time members of this site know, I employ my own chess knowledge (1950 uscf with 30 years of playing the game), A super chess program that I wrote that knows how to draw even the toughest of opponents (it's win percentage is 3% its loss percentage is ZERO%, and its draw percentage is 97%), and an extensive understanding of psychology that allows me to manipulate my opponents. Combine these elements and you have me...THE UNMATEABLE ONE.

Please refer to The Big Showdown now. Look at the board. Do you all remember my number one chess COMMANDMENT? ATTACK THE CENTER NO MATTER WHAT IS HAPPENING TO YOU. Ignore attacks on your pieces elsewhere. DO NOT defend in ANY circumstance unless there is a check upon you. Look at my pieces PUNISHING the center. Look at how my king is running about without a care. I am dividing and conquering. Look at my development, it is like a spear pointing at their heart. Look at my IMPENETRABLE pawn wall. I dont care a hoot about his king. Going for the king is not what it's about.....at this point.

Now, Team lightforce is no slouch. Last I heard there were dozens of people on that team, many running deep fritz and rybka. Look at how just little old me and my homemade program LURED them in. Like a spider luring an ant. They want my king so bad that they and their "commercial" chess programs couldn't see what I had in store for them. Do you see it? They just LOST their rook when I get my turn. I am attacking the Queen AND the ROOK. Too bad I'm not planning on going on vacation so you can DENY me a vacation and take the "win" like team chess.com did. SORRY.

17 moves into the game and it's all but OVER. DOZENS of top notch computer programs couldnt manage to pull off even a draw with me. Heck, my win percentage may go from 3% to 3.5% now.

Remember my rules. NEVER DEFEND, The top chess players in the world were NEVER known for their defensive playing. Develop your pieces toward the center, or at least have them attacking central squares. The fianchetto is more often than not the kiss of death when developing pieces. Push to the center, good things will happen. King safety is overrated. Use the king as bait. Bring him into the fight and gain an advantage.

I suspect team lightforce will resign shortly. When they do, is there any TEAM out there that has the GUTS to go toe to toe with the UNMATEABLE ONE?


oh, shut up.

CharlesDarwin1809

to the self appointed legend (cheater), any one can be unmateable if they haven't the testicular fortitude to see games through to the end or they cheat by using a program. Get a life.

missingkasparov

So when are we going to play? or are you just another talking head? I have nothing to loose but you do. Until you man up later! and stop cheating use chess software Rybka 3

generalyao

Why don't you play yourself then? If what you said is true, it'll be a paradox and the space-time continuum should warp and implode.

thedoorman

I've read posts on forums where suspected cheaters and those using chess engines were rightfully chastised and subsiquently banned from chess.com.

Chess.com administrators profess an ability to find cheaters and and remove them (are you listening Eric?).

So how is it 'cheater_1' can boast to all of his blantant rules violation (past and present) and remain unscathed and seemingly untouchable by chess.com administrators?

REMOVE and BAN THIS CHEAT!!

Baseballfan

thedoorman, the long and short of it is, for all his faults, cheater_1 has not cheated on this site. He doesn't play any games here, save for a few specific vote chess games where using an engine is allowed. If he were to play/cheat here, he would no longer be here, and he knows that.

soundhound

WOW I thought only rock stars had ego's!! This guy is the David Lee Roth of chess!

bastiaan

ughh

Ripper89

The truth is that Lightforce played very weakly,there were a few beginner-level mistakes so I don't understand why this cheater-guy is unmateable.I agree that you have to attack the center but I disagree that the fianchetto is bad,while beginning the game with a fianchetto you can still attack the center while your king is safe and you don't need it as a bait......anyway...real masters don't catch a bait so easily.