I beat Carlsen but I am only 407 elo!!!

Sort:
Lemonade

U need the actual analysis link

SGP_Chess

https://www.chess.com/game/computer/184397283

Lemonade

Not trying to be that guy, but it seems you played by yourself and seemed engine help in the endgame

SGP_Chess

No, I used books instead and copied (not exactly, then a bit modified) the moves.

SGP_Chess

It is an Advanced 489-page chessbook.

Lemonade

Ohhh

SGP_Chess

Ok, now mesage me in the priivate chat.

SacrifycedStoat
Nice use of the hint button
SacrifycedStoat
O nvm
RandomChessPlayer62

Cheating using books is still cheating.

c124875

I game reviewed it, the game review shows you have 91.2 accuracy for a 90 move game which is insane.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/184397283?tab=review

c124875

Congrats

Sobrukai

Definitely used a computer

HangingPiecesChomper

Why are people throwing out accusations with no evidence. I think he won without cheating.

RandomChessPlayer62
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

Why are people throwing out accusations with no evidence. I think he won without cheating.

I doubt. His strategy seemed Scholar's Mate-like in the opening and I simply cannot see a Scholar's Mater beating an actually good player/bot without assistance.

randomchessguy555

Beat him on an alt account and it happens to be closed. No proof. Hmmm, strange

SGP_Chess

Definitely used a computer// Definetely used books

RandomChessPlayer62
SGP_Chess wrote:

Definitely used a computer// Definetely used books

Books is still cheating