I can’t even rant about my frustration

Sort:
goldenduckhunter
since I came back on this site.I have reported plenty of players, nothing has been done. I blame Hans neinman for taking money from chess.com. they can only deal with complaints from paying members. Anyhow In exchange for playing these bots I got pretty strong IRL. So thank you
Martin_Stahl
goldenduckhunter wrote:
since I came back on this site.I have reported plenty of players, nothing has been done. I blame Hans neinman for taking money from chess.com. they can only deal with complaints from paying members. Anyhow In exchange for playing these bots I got pretty strong IRL. So thank you

It's absolutely not true that reports are only taken or actioned from premium accounts.

goldenduckhunter
iMNaki wrote:
It’s just Chess.com being behind cheaters, much like the government is behind the curve against hackers; pretty lame

Well what can we do lol. Most vip playing perfect games is also laughable. It would be nice if we could give them some tongue lashing.

goldenduckhunter
Martin_Stahl wrote:
goldenduckhunter wrote:
since I came back on this site.I have reported plenty of players, nothing has been done. I blame Hans neinman for taking money from chess.com. they can only deal with complaints from paying members. Anyhow In exchange for playing these bots I got pretty strong IRL. So thank you

It's absolutely not true that reports are only taken or actioned from premium accounts.

How would you know; youre just bot. A mouth piece who doesn’t know the ins and out shouldn’t be using “absolutely” lol. pretty sure am not the only one that thinks this.

Martin_Stahl

You can believe that if you like but doesn't make it true. happy

RopemakerStreet

In theory it makes sense they'd prioritise paying customers then freebie accounts.

MaetsNori

A question that comes to mind: would Chess.com willingly close a paying account for fair play and/or abuse ... if it meant losing the revenue from their membership?

Or would Chess.com offer that member a chance of redemption, in order to keep them on as a paying customer?

(I'm not asking this with any criticism in mind - I'm genuinely curious.)

goldenduckhunter
IronSteam1 wrote:

A question that comes to mind: would Chess.com willingly close a paying account for fair play and/or abuse ... if it meant losing the revenue from their membership?

Or would Chess.com offer that member a chance of redemption, in order to keep them on as a paying customer?

(I'm not asking this with any criticism in mind - I'm genuinely curious.)

Dog don’t care of owners morality; its only interested in getting fed. 😉

Martin_Stahl
IronSteam1 wrote:

A question that comes to mind: would Chess.com willingly close a paying account for fair play and/or abuse ... if it meant losing the revenue from their membership?

Or would Chess.com offer that member a chance of redemption, in order to keep them on as a paying customer?

(I'm not asking this with any criticism in mind - I'm genuinely curious.)

The site closes both premium and titled players and the payment status has no bearing on the decision to close.

goldenduckhunter
Martin_Stahl wrote:
IronSteam1 wrote:

A question that comes to mind: would Chess.com willingly close a paying account for fair play and/or abuse ... if it meant losing the revenue from their membership?

Or would Chess.com offer that member a chance of redemption, in order to keep them on as a paying customer?

(I'm not asking this with any criticism in mind - I'm genuinely curious.)

The site closes both premium and titled players and the payment status has no bearing on the decision to close.

You telling every opponent Ive had were clean since I came back? I think most people left and these are bots. Perhaps I’m wrong, I know I’m wrong, aren’t I wrong? “Absolutely” wrong!

SriyoTheGreat
RopemakerStreet wrote:

In theory it makes sense they'd prioritise paying customers then freebie accounts.

Well "theory" doesn't prove anything. Show me the piece of code which displays premium accounts first. If you do that I'll believe you.

goldenduckhunter

This tread can’t been seen in the forum. Chess.com censorship and response are from paid actors hahahaha

Galaxialt
goldenduckhunter wrote:

This tread can’t been seen in the forum. Chess.com censorship and response are from paid actors hahahaha

your thread is the first one in the General discussion topics lmao

goldenduckhunter

This place annoys me; I get waves of chess.com bots then losing streak hits. As consolation rating drops make it easier for the league. Win win, I get some training with bots and might win some cold hard cash. Thanks bots. Do people win cash or it’s just advertising?

Martin_Stahl
goldenduckhunter wrote:

This place annoys me; I get waves of chess.com bots then losing streak hits. As consolation rating drops make it easier for the league. Win win, I get some training with bots and might win some cold hard cash. Thanks bots. Do people win cash or it’s just advertising?

There are no prizes for finishing in any place in a division or getting nor getting to any level. When leagues were first released, there was a contest and the Legend club used to have a monthly cash arena, but that is being redesigned.

goldenduckhunter
Martin_Stahl chess.com lover

When someone placed 1st in legends they don’t get $1😂,🙃🙂🙃.

SriyoTheGreat
goldenduckhunter wrote:
Martin_Stahl chess.com lover

When someone placed 1st in legends they don’t get $1😂,🙃🙂🙃.

1. You didn't even read his comment properly.

2. "There are no prizes for finishing in any place in a division or getting nor getting to any level." This is literally the first line of his comment. There only used to be prizes in cash arenas which is being redesigned currently.

3. If you don't like this site then there is a close account button. That is way better and respectful than ranting on forums.

goldenduckhunter
SriyogeshS_paid actor here to save the day! 

Come again? I didn’t quite get. I’m a 🐢

SriyoTheGreat

*sigh*

This is pointless, goodbye

goldenduckhunter

I haven’t face much bots today, then again I only played a couple.

This forum topic has been locked