I could hypothetically beat Vishwanathan Anand if I really wanted to - Chess Forums - Page 9

22kevin2007

Feb 4, 2021

0

#161

lol even anand cant foresee 100 trillion moves ahead

tacticspotter

Feb 4, 2021

0

#162

IAmPomi 写道:

tacticspotter wrote:

IAmPomi 写道:

Look. I believe him, I actually think he can look 10 moves ahead. But, not with time pressure. Anand maybe looks 3 moves ahead, but without time pressure he probably looks more.

you believe that he can look 100 trillion moves ahead?

Who's he? MervinHenderson? Not really, most of those combinations can be discarded. But yeah, I think he can look a lot of combinations.

So you believe a random person can calculate 100 trillion moves ahead(already discarded 200 trillion moves) and anand,a grandmaster a few hundred rating higher than him,can only calculate 27000 moves ahead

Makes sence

ok thats...

PerpetualPatzer123

Feb 4, 2021

0

#163

IAmPomi wrote:

Look. I believe him, I actually think he can look 10 moves ahead. But, not with time pressure. Anand maybe looks 3 moves ahead, but without time pressure he probably looks more.

Anand doesn’t need to calculate because he knows what the position needs.

MABailey26

Feb 4, 2021

0

#164

Nice troll lol. This made my day of how funny it is. GM vs. 2000 rated daily player lmao

tacticspotter

Feb 4, 2021

0

#165

MABailey26 写道:

Nice troll lol. This made my day of how funny it is. GM vs. 2000 rated daily player lmao

While he loses to 1600 many many time

FM serverbusy

Feb 4, 2021

0

#166

obv the op is a troll

PunchboxNET

Feb 4, 2021

0

#167

did you ever actually play @rychessmaster1?

EscherehcsE

Feb 4, 2021

0

#168

MervinHenderson wrote:

Doesn't Vishwanathan Anand only see three moves ahead? I read somewhere that he does. Well, I can see more than like ten moves ahead sometimes more. That's what I mean when I say Elo rating isn't everything. You can't just measure ability and talent with a rating.

So anyway if I played Anand all I would need to do was go through every since variation on the board and if I had enough time on the chess clock and since I could see more moves ahead than him I would hypothetically win that game

I could hypothetically believe you if I wanted to...

SpeckledGrill

Feb 4, 2021

0

#169

MervinHenderson wrote:

Doesn't Vishwanathan Anand only see three moves ahead? I read somewhere that he does. Well, I can see more than like ten moves ahead sometimes more. That's what I mean when I say Elo rating isn't everything. You can't just measure ability and talent with a rating.

So anyway if I played Anand all I would need to do was go through every since variation on the board and if I had enough time on the chess clock and since I could see more moves ahead than him I would hypothetically win that game

Hahahahhahahah

Strangemover

Feb 4, 2021

0

#170

Or trolling. I was going to say poor trolling but I suppose there are 10 pages of responses so that's a win for the troll.

22kevin2007

Feb 4, 2021

0

#171

Yeah go look at Mervin's profile games. Look at his lose streak lmao

EscherehcsE

Feb 4, 2021

0

#172

AlaskanMiracleMan wrote:

MervinHenderson wrote:

Doesn't Vishwanathan Anand only see three moves ahead? I read somewhere that he does. Well, I can see more than like ten moves ahead sometimes more. That's what I mean when I say Elo rating isn't everything. You can't just measure ability and talent with a rating.

So anyway if I played Anand all I would need to do was go through every since variation on the board and if I had enough time on the chess clock and since I could see more moves ahead than him I would hypothetically win that game

Chess.com should ban you for your arrogance.

Haha, the trolls win when you fail to spot them...

22kevin2007

Feb 4, 2021

0

#173

And yet he thinks he can beat one the top players in the world

Strangemover

Feb 4, 2021

0

#174

22kevin2007 wrote:

And yet he thinks he can beat one the top players in the world

No, he thinks (correctly) that he can illicit a strong reaction by making such an outlandish claim and then maintaining this position when challenged.

22kevin2007

Feb 4, 2021

0

#175

yes

PunchboxNET

Feb 5, 2021

0

#176

You never played @rychessmaster1, @MervinHenderson

nTzT

Feb 5, 2021

0

#177

You could also hypothetically suffer from delusion

nTzT

Feb 5, 2021

0

#178

MABailey26 wrote:

Nice troll lol. This made my day of how funny it is. GM vs. 2000 rated daily player lmao

He isn't even 2000 rated. He just set his profile to that and whenever he plays it will decrease just like his other ratings. Look at his blitz winrate.

PunchboxNET

Feb 5, 2021

0

#179

If you say you can beat Anand, then you are insulting his chess ability

tacticspotter

Feb 5, 2021

0

#180

I can also hypothetically beat magnus carlsen if he blunders 10 times

you can also hypothetically post a stupid forum about hypothetically beating anand and also being able to see a hundred trillion move variations ahead

chess.com can hypothetically become the most popular website right now by some miracle