I hate it whenever I miss a tactic especially when it is a simple one. My tactics rating went from a 1785 to a 1550. I planned to get up to 1800 by yesterday, but of course it had to go down. Should I read chess books? I haven't read one yet, and I'm planning to read lots of chess books to get much better.
I tend to think that many people here get 2000+ tactics rating without reading from chess books.
There is great value in studying books but there are also many resources online that offer the same lessons.
Tactics books just offer printed copies of hundreds or thousands of puzzles. I don't remember any that had special insight as to how to go about solving them quickly.
One benefit is that they require that you think all the way through the combinations. The online puzzles reward you for only finding the first move or first couple.
You've only been doing puzzles for a few days.
Look at the advanced stats for puzzles. It tells you what kind of puzzle themes you have trouble with.
Evidently, you have trouble with zugswang and with advanced and two bishop checkmates. You can practice those themes in training mode until you improve.
I hate it whenever I miss a tactic especially when it is a simple one. My tactics rating went from a 1785 to a 1550. I planned to get up to 1800 by yesterday, but of course it had to go down. Should I read chess books? I haven't read one yet, and I'm planning to read lots of chess books to get much better.
I tend to think that many people here get 2000+ tactics rating without reading from chess books.