Just ignoring you
I find 'win quick' gambits disgusting
Sort:
Oct 1, 2020
0
#243
BTW, the much maligned Dr Tarrasch described White's 4th in the Fegatello as "Duffer's Move"
I know it is because of Na5, but for me personally, I like Na5 lines as white
Oui mais c'est ça les blancs sont supposés avoir l'avantage, et il est beacoup plus facile de jouer cette position avec les noirs
Richard_Hunter wrote:
I'm sick of all these 'how to crush lower rated players with XXX gambit' type videos. Is this all people care about, getting a quick win by reciting a few moves by rote? At best, you'll improve your rating for a short while but then get kicked back down when you have to actually play real chess. I don't think we should be encouraging this sort of thing. I really want to shout abuse at someone when they play some stupid gambit.
Sounds like some unhappy things are going on in this poor guy's life!
In my club`s "non gambit" events, we will allow the Queen`s Gambit (Declined or Accepted) since it is not a "true" gambit. Also, a player has to get advance permission from the tournament committee to be allowed to play it. We, of course, grant it. To be honest, less than half the club plays in such contests but, to be fair, we run regular events simultaneously as well. For those who think that this is wrong, it is no more so than a thematic tournament in which all participants must play a certain opening/defense.
Oct 1, 2020
0
#249
Scandalous troll. No such tournament. If you don't like gambits... don't play or take them?! Gambits are fun.
Chessflyfisher wrote:
In my club`s "non gambit" events, we will allow the Queen`s Gambit (Declined or Accepted) since it is not a "true" gambit. Also, a player has to get advance permission from the tournament committee to be allowed to play it. We, of course, grant it. To be honest, less than half the club plays in such contests but, to be fair, we run regular events simultaneously as well. For those who think that this is wrong, it is no more so than a thematic tournament in which all participants must play a certain opening/defense.
Very sensible approach.
SNUDOO wrote:
chamo2074 wrote:
PILOTOXOMXD a écrit :
The Fried Liver isn't a good opening, even I know that, but no one can defend against it in U1200-land
if white plays Na5
are you intoxicated by any chance
Na5 just blunders another pawn. Bb5+ c6 dxc6 and White just gains a pawn. Wut???? U peepel need bter ideeuas
CrackPipeLion wrote:
Scandalous troll. No such tournament. If you don't like gambits... don't play or take them?! Gambits are fun.
I thought U said Gambits are insane, just play logically and positionally?
Richard_Hunter wrote:
Chessflyfisher wrote:
In my club`s "non gambit" events, we will allow the Queen`s Gambit (Declined or Accepted) since it is not a "true" gambit. Also, a player has to get advance permission from the tournament committee to be allowed to play it. We, of course, grant it. To be honest, less than half the club plays in such contests but, to be fair, we run regular events simultaneously as well. For those who think that this is wrong, it is no more so than a thematic tournament in which all participants must play a certain opening/defense.
Very sensible approach.
For those who are terrified of gambits. Learn how to play one, and you'll like it. Don't pound on fun openings because you aren't good enough to play it, or beat it
Oct 1, 2020
0
#254
Reckless speculation: gambit players are more likely to smoke weed.
PILOTOXOMXD wrote:
Richard_Hunter wrote:
Chessflyfisher wrote:
In my club`s "non gambit" events, we will allow the Queen`s Gambit (Declined or Accepted) since it is not a "true" gambit. Also, a player has to get advance permission from the tournament committee to be allowed to play it. We, of course, grant it. To be honest, less than half the club plays in such contests but, to be fair, we run regular events simultaneously as well. For those who think that this is wrong, it is no more so than a thematic tournament in which all participants must play a certain opening/defense.
Very sensible approach.
For those who are terrified of gambits. Learn how to play one, and you'll like it. Don't pound on fun openings because you aren't good enough to play it, or beat it
1265 rated player tells 1600+ rated player that he's not good enough to play his feeble gambits. ROFLMAO.
Pump ur rating with drawn games, and use SF to win. U ain't good enuff to beat gambits. Ur to weak, so u use Stockfish to win. Go tell ur mommy how proud I am of you, u bot
This guy seems like a troll, saying the same point over and over, without countering any of the counterarguments.
me or this guy
PILOTOXOMXD wrote:
Pump ur rating with drawn games, and use SF to win. U ain't good enuff to beat gambits. Ur to weak, so u use Stockfish to win. Go tell ur mommy how proud I am of you, u bot
or did she have to teach you how to use stockfish
I guessed that might have been the case, especially after you said so.