The more interesting point to me is that I'm not entirely sure I would have realized this position favored white, much less by that much, at least not without really playing around with the position. I mean, sure white has the open file and black's bishop doesnt currently have a ton of scope, while white's is bishop is going to remain annoying, but black has the queenside majority and the half open f-file.
I found a move Stockfish didn't?
Sort:
May 17, 2022
0
#25
In that position I think Bg5 would be stronger because Re7 is a threat and Bf6 would be strong. Stockfish has done this to me. https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/398433419 See this game of mine, I won this, but when you see 25. ef5, stockfish did not see ef5 until I played it after in my game review.
The reason to why stockfish might not always find the actual best move in given position is because Stockfish itself is limited to a level beyond human. Imagine Stockfish 20 in future, that version of stockfish will even better moves than your vision and faster lines, in given position, with best possible line. So dont consider stockfish as absolute, as it is not absolute but way way better than you.
It had c6 for less than 9 seconds before switching to Ne8, but it also showed 0.00. It´s supposed to be -/+?
I should put it to show 2 lines.