I hit 1400 in bullet - Chess Forums - Page 2

BroiledRat

Apr 22, 2021

0

#21

If you want to see someone who tilted in rapid, gaze in horror upon me.

A few bad sessions in a row brought me down to the 1400’s.

Several losses were due to mouse slips, so isn’t that wonderful.

ninjaswat

Apr 22, 2021

0

#22

BroiledRat wrote:

If you want to see someone who tilted in rapid, gaze in horror upon me.

A few bad sessions in a row brought me down to the 1400’s.

Several losses were due to mouse slips, so isn’t that wonderful.

I managed to mouse-slip a full bishop and still won that rapid game You know what's worse? Losing due to connection problems when you have mate in one on the board. IN A RAPID GAME...

sndeww

Apr 22, 2021

0

#23

my blitz used to be a mountain climber, until I started playing 3min.

Lemon

Apr 22, 2021

0

#24

modipaduollemmers wrote:

I hit 1400 in bullet(even though I prefer hyperbullet like andrew tang)does anyone have tips for improving and going to 1500?thanks a lot

Hi, the 1900 at ultrabullet here I know this sounds cringy, but practicing a lot helps. I hit 1600-1800 in a matter of 1 day. Just practice moving the pieces fast and logic behind it

kaissapy

Apr 22, 2021

0

#25

FM Kakaroto_28

Apr 22, 2021

0

#26

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

modipaduollemmers

Apr 22, 2021

0

#27

ninjaswat wrote:

modipaduollemmers wrote:

I hit 1400 in bullet(even though I prefer hyperbullet like andrew tang)does anyone have tips for improving and going to 1500?thanks a lot

I just hit 1700, so yay. Honestly trying something new and tiliting in a somewhat positive way is the best way for me to improve. Maybe later we can do a few unrated practice matches to warm up before grinding.

thanks

elmo12878

Apr 22, 2021

0

#28

may I ask how it is possible that you are only 1000 in blitz and 800 in rapid but so good at bullet? this is really bizarre as usually people are better at longer time controls and worse at shorter time controls...

NautilusBridge

Apr 22, 2021

0

#29

elmo12878 hat geschrieben:

may I ask how it is possible that you are only 1000 in blitz and 800 in rapid but so good at bullet? this is really bizarre as usually people are better at longer time controls and worse at shorter time controls...

he has like 3000+ games in bullet...

Lemon

Apr 22, 2021

0

#30

elmo12878 wrote:

may I ask how it is possible that you are only 1000 in blitz and 800 in rapid but so good at bullet? this is really bizarre as usually people are better at longer time controls and worse at shorter time controls...

Lol, check my profile

NautilusBridge

Apr 22, 2021

0

#31

TheGMUltraplayerClub hat geschrieben:

elmo12878 wrote:

may I ask how it is possible that you are only 1000 in blitz and 800 in rapid but so good at bullet? this is really bizarre as usually people are better at longer time controls and worse at shorter time controls...

Lol, check my profile

Thanks for giving me eye cancer.

ninjaswat

Apr 22, 2021

0

#32

TheGMUltraplayerClub wrote:

elmo12878 wrote:

may I ask how it is possible that you are only 1000 in blitz and 800 in rapid but so good at bullet? this is really bizarre as usually people are better at longer time controls and worse at shorter time controls...

Lol, check my profile

So that's why I have beaten a couple 1900s in bullet...

ninjaswat

Apr 22, 2021

0

#33

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

This celebration of mediocrity is pathetic. To me, 1400 means you're an EXTREMELY WEAK BEGINNER! I could get a lobotomy, have my corpus callosum severed, be tired, drunk, and distracted, and still not fall below 1800, even on my worst day. And here you are celebrating a rating so low you should be embarrassed!

Nice that someone who's played 75ish games is dissing those that have played literally THOUSANDS of games more than them. You started at 2000, how would you be if you started at 800? Hmm?

SpacePodz

Apr 22, 2021

0

#34

Just let the man celebrate his win dude. It’s just a board game, no need to get so mad about it.

ninjaswat

Apr 22, 2021

0

#35

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

SpacePodz wrote:

Just let the man celebrate his win dude. It’s just a board game, no need to get so mad about it.

It's not a "win" to suck at something and pretend you're good at it. It's pathetic. The fact that you can't understand that and also the fact that you can't even get a rating over 700, lol, proves that you are even more pathetic than the loser who is posting about his extremely low rating!

You know, you should try to face some ACTUAL professional players... they don't treat us like this, maybe then you'll learn respect. GMs have lost to 800s before, you're saying that you're better than me just after learning the pieces even though this is my 8th or 9th year playing chess?? If so you should be a GM at least. You're not.

SpacePodz

Apr 22, 2021

0

#36

Ugh this forum was fine now it’s just being taken over by elitism. Can never let people enjoy the smallest wins. I just play chess casually and for fun, I don’t care about my rating. If my lack of skill at a board game makes me pathetic then I’m fine being “pathetic”

ninjaswat

Apr 22, 2021

0

#37

SpacePodz wrote:

Ugh this forum was fine now it’s just being taken over by elitism. Can never let people enjoy the smallest wins. I just play chess casually and for fun, I don’t care about my rating. If my lack of skill at a board game makes me pathetic then I’m fine being “pathetic”

+1

ninjaswat

Apr 22, 2021

0

#38

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

icyboyyy wrote:

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

ninjaswat wrote:

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

This celebration of mediocrity is pathetic. To me, 1400 means you're an EXTREMELY WEAK BEGINNER! I could get a lobotomy, have my corpus callosum severed, be tired, drunk, and distracted, and still not fall below 1800, even on my worst day. And here you are celebrating a rating so low you should be embarrassed!

Nice that someone who's played 75ish games is dissing those that have played literally THOUSANDS of games more than them. You started at 2000, how would you be if you started at 800? Hmm?

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Playing a lot of chess has nothing at all to do with having the ability to get good at chess. There are hoards of dumb guys like you who will never be able to get beyond the level of weakling because you lack the intelligence for the game. I was better at chess than you will ever be shortly after learning how the pieces move. And now I'm essentially a GOD compared to you. That's reality! You can live in denial all you want, but reality won't budge!

Classic chess elitist

I'm not even in the élite. I'm just a strong amateur. But you guys are so dumb it makes me cringe. I suspect you're wearing your dunce mask right now and still going on about how much you love BLM and hate Trump! Sheer stupidity!

Chess.com doesn't abide by you starting political arguments here. Seriously, Trump was impeached twice and it's stupid that some hate him???

Lemon

Apr 22, 2021

0

#39

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

icyboyyy wrote:

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

ninjaswat wrote:

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

icyboyyy wrote:

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

ninjaswat wrote:

Whine-and-Cheese wrote:

This celebration of mediocrity is pathetic. To me, 1400 means you're an EXTREMELY WEAK BEGINNER! I could get a lobotomy, have my corpus callosum severed, be tired, drunk, and distracted, and still not fall below 1800, even on my worst day. And here you are celebrating a rating so low you should be embarrassed!

Nice that someone who's played 75ish games is dissing those that have played literally THOUSANDS of games more than them. You started at 2000, how would you be if you started at 800? Hmm?

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Playing a lot of chess has nothing at all to do with having the ability to get good at chess. There are hoards of dumb guys like you who will never be able to get beyond the level of weakling because you lack the intelligence for the game. I was better at chess than you will ever be shortly after learning how the pieces move. And now I'm essentially a GOD compared to you. That's reality! You can live in denial all you want, but reality won't budge!

Classic chess elitist

I'm not even in the élite. I'm just a strong amateur. But you guys are so dumb it makes me cringe. I suspect you're wearing your dunce mask right now and still going on about how much you love BLM and hate Trump! Sheer stupidity!

Chess.com doesn't abide by you starting political arguments here. Seriously, Trump was impeached twice and it's stupid that some hate him???

I didn't start any political discussion, imbecile. I made a statement of fact. Stupid people like you don't just suck at chess. You're on the idiot's side of every discussion and debate. You're probably pro gun control and pro (man made) climate change too!

Nope, I'm not a psychic. I just know how retards think. That is WHY you suck at chess. You can't think at all. You just mindlessly go along with what you are told to believe in every issue.

"We're on the idiot's side of every discussion and debate."

Mate, you're the one on the idiot's side in this one

I'm not your "mate", little boy. And you are not a "we". You're just one sad little turd who is too stupid to have a conversation with about anything, let alone chess. Go find something shiny to stare at while you drool.

adding to long

a

SpacePodz

Apr 22, 2021

0

#40

I’m about 90% sure he’s trolling but he’s doing such a good job that I can’t even tell :/