I need a book...

Sort:
Ty39wastakenlol

My current blitz ranking is 725 and I’m looking to get a book, but I only want to get one. Does anyone know  any book that covers everything from openings to checkmates for someone my level?

jambyvedar

get winning chess strategy for kids by coackley.

kindaspongey

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708094112/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review332.pdf

kindaspongey

It might be of interest to look at A COMPLETE CHESS COURSE by Antonio Gude.
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/A_Complete_Chess_Course.pdf

I think that a variety of topics are discussed.

little_ernie

Another good book to start with is The Complete Idiot's Guide to Chess by Patrick Wolff.

This covers a large amount of material from opening principles to tactics and strategy, well explained.  

kindaspongey

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708110052/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review587.pdf

Ty39wastakenlol

Thanks!

EhTrashyPanda

chess the immortal game

kindaspongey

https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/2015/06/04/the-soviet-chess-primer/

"... The title might suggest it is for beginners, but that is not the case. [The Soviet Chess Primer] does start off with some basic positions, but quickly moves on to much more advanced material including chapters on positional play and techniques of calculation." - IM John Donaldson

https://www.qualitychess.co.uk/ebooks/Soviet_Chess_Primer-extract.pdf

kindaspongey
BobbyTalparov wrote:

... Now, if you want a bit more thorough, you can go with a book series.  Seirawan's Winning Chess series ...

http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092617/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review560.pdf

kindaspongey

Lasker's Manual of Chess

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104828/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review658.pdf

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5856bd64ff7c50433c3803db/t/5a0dcda2ec212de097e22482/1510854051856/lasker%27s_manual_excerpt.pdf

The_Aggressive_Bee

I agree.  The English is old fashioned but good.  Nimzowitsch's My System is a good one to keep in mind if you ever decide to get a second one but Dr. Lasker's book is my suggestion.

kindaspongey
DeirdreSkye wrote:

I will agree that Tarrasch book is by far the best complete cook for beginners.

The only drawback , you need to work with it. If you love chess that is actually a huge advantage.

Published about 8 or 9 decades ago.

kindaspongey

Opening coverage might be considered to be a little dated.

kindaspongey
BobbyTalparov wrote:

... For a beginner, playing the opening as well as Tarrasch, Steinitz, Chigorin, Lasker, Capablanca, etc. would be a massive accomplishment.

Something that would necessarily be accomplished by reading a book from more than 80 years ago? Are there perhaps easier goals that would be more suitable for a modern beginner?

RussBell

Good Chess Books for Beginners and Beyond....

https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/good-chess-books-for-beginners-and-beyond

 

blueemu
Tigerfunx wrote:

My current blitz ranking is 725 and I’m looking to get a book, but I only want to get one. Does anyone know  any book that covers everything from openings to checkmates for someone my level?

If it's your Blitz play specifically that you want to improve, then a chess book aimed at general improvement might not be your best bet.

Best might be to isolate the skills that Blitz demands (eg: tactical alertness, a quick grasp of shifting opportunities, the ability to watch the whole board instead of getting fixated on one part of it, etc) and start working on those particular skills.

Naturally an across-the-board improvement in all chess skills will help your Blitz, too.

kindaspongey
"'The Game of Chess; is, of course, a great choice. ..." - BobbyTalparov (~6 hours ago)
"Opening coverage might be considered to be a little dated." - kindaspongey (~2 hours ago)
BobbyTalparov  wrote:

... Saying the opening coverage is a bit dated would only matter once they are approaching ~1800-2000 where some players may have studied enough to take advantage of any mild inaccuracies the old masters played. ...

What about lines that occurred little or not at all, 80 or more years ago?

kindaspongey
BobbyTalparov  wrote:

… the opening principles haven't changed in the last 100 years, ...

Did Tarrasch write 72 pages on opening principles?

kindaspongey
BobbyTalparov  wrote:

... having any of those old masters as a guide is not going to inhibit the growth of a beginner. …

My guess is that Tigerfunx wanted HELP with openings instead of mearly an absence of inhibition.