you are the best player i have ever faced in a very long time
I need help

you are the best player i have ever faced in a very long time
Stop making multiple accounts then cheating against yourself for attention.

yeahh.... thats true
he came up to me suddenly and wanted to play and his game agianst me have been 90%+ accuracy

You played 90% accuracy too in 2nd game. That was all theory. Me opening master so me win with no distraction.

@ironstem1
Yeah, I'm not sure, but already suspected the first time... turtle kangaroo kid has cheated before (at least he said he has) so he knows how this works... I also think he's trolled, so he knows how that works too.

What makes me doubt it is this troll consistently uses punctuation more often so... I guess more likely it's 2 different people, but pretty sure turtle kid knows what's going on.

paper llama go back to grazing grass and stop calling everyone a troll, nobody takes you very seriously anymore

paper llama go back to grazing grass and stop calling everyone a troll, nobody takes you very seriously anymore
Hahahahaah very funny

paper llama go back to grazing grass and stop calling everyone a troll, nobody takes you very seriously anymore
And FWIW, it's what poker players call polarizing... you're either pretending to be very dumb, or you are very dumb, there's nothing in the middle...
Calling you a pretender is better than the alternative 😇

I think it's two different people, @paper_llama. But I've seen players do what you've described.
Going way back to Yahoo Chess days, there was a player who had the highest rating I'd seen. (If you remember, if you played there, the "Red" players were the high-rateds?) I don't even recall what it was, but it was something astronomical.
This account always played games against other insanely high-rated Reds, with brilliant wins every game. Undefeated. And this person had a fan club of players who would "ooh" and "ahh" at the moves during the game - to which the player would say things like, "Obvious mistake. Another one bites the dust, heh."
The game chat would be full of "Yay! Go! Crush 'em!" from their followers.
I suspected something and pulled up one of their current games in a database. It was lesser-known Bobby Fischer game, move by move.
Then I went back through their opponent's histories and saw similar names going back months ... all playing against each other, with resignations after 1 or 2 moves each time.
So this person had created dozens of their own accounts ... played them against each other to pad their ratings upward ... then created the "unbeatable" account that would defeat them all in live games ... by manually inputting the moves to decisive GM games from a database ...
All for the purpose of ... looking like a SuperGM in front of online fans on Yahoo Chess ...
It was one of the weirdest things I've seen, as far as online chess behavior goes. Extreme dedication to a bizarre ruse.

I think it's two different people, @paper_llama. But I've seen players do what you've described.
Going way back to Yahoo Chess days, there was a player who had the highest rating I'd seen. (If you remember, if you played there, the "Red" players were the high-rateds?) I don't even recall what it was, but it was something astronomical.
Yeah, I saw accounts with 5 digit ratings back then.
This account always played games against other insanely high-rated Reds, with brilliant wins every game. Undefeated. And this person had a fan club of players who would "ooh" and "ahh" at the moves during the game - to which the player would say things like, "Obvious mistake. Another one bites the dust, heh."
The game chat would be full of "Yay! Go! Crush 'em!" from their followers.
I suspected something and pulled up one of their current games in a database. It was lesser-known Bobby Fischer game, move by move.
One time I went to one of the tables where there was some kind of online club that regularly met. Loser stood up was the rule. It had wound down and no one was playing, so I logged on with two accounts and copied an Anand Kramnik game... someone noticed and said "1400 does not play like this" or something (whatever my rating was) and I said where the game was from.
Then I went back through their opponent's histories and saw similar names going back months ... all playing against each other, with resignations after 1 or 2 moves each time.
So this person had created dozens of their own accounts ... played them against each other to pad their ratings upward ... then created the "unbeatable" account that would defeat them all in live games ... by manually inputting the moves to decisive GM games from a database ...
All for the purpose of ... looking like a SuperGM in front of online fans on Yahoo Chess ...
It was one of the weirdest things I've seen, as far as chess behavior goes. Extreme dedication to a bizarre ruse.
I'd encountered similar people on other websites before chess.com existed. One person whose record was something like 2000 wins and 10 losses. They only played 30 minute time control and took a very long time on every move. They had fans who would cheer them on in the chat... very obvious to any actual chess player what was going on.

woah, cool story
but what would i gain by playing myself in unrated games?
I already said: attention.

But I assume you're not good enough to consistently use punctuation with one troll and consistently not use it on your main account... so yeah, my guess is two different people... but I'm surprised at kangaroo kid's reaction to the very obvious cheater(s).

ok
chess players are supposed to be smart, you should ask yourself why i would want it
Attention seeking is a common behavior, and you have a history of that already, with your topics where you ask for help improving but then ignore advice to keep the attention coming.

ok
chess players are supposed to be smart, you should ask yourself why i would want it
Attention seeking is a common behavior, and you have a history of that already, with your topics where you ask for help improving but then ignore advice to keep the attention coming.
i do not ignore advice, you come in claiming you are trying to help me. you do nothing. then you call me a troll like you do everyone
You've created an idealized opponent in your mind - one who only plays the kinds of openings that you enjoy facing, and one who only plays in the style that you enjoy playing against.
Now, whenever an opponent doesn't fit this idealized version you have in your mind, you get frustrated, angry, triggered, tilted ...
You also get angry / frustrated whenever you make minor mistakes ... even to the point where you will resign over something relatively small.
In short, you're letting your emotions control you, rather than the other way around.
Let go of this idealized opponent that you have in your mind - play against the moves on the board, not the person.
Let go of these ideal openings and styles that you want your opponents to play with. Train yourself to think like a many-armed octopus - capable of handling anything that comes your way.
And be more forgiving of yourself when you make mistakes. We all make mistakes. Allow yourself to tip your hat to your opponent when they make good moves. Laugh at yourself when you make a bone-headed blunder.
A positive mindset will take you farther than beating yourself up all the time.