I need Help to 1600 from EVERYONE
Sort:
Kaynight Please qualify your statement (On the CHESS.com FORUM)
Also kayknight please take your Extra large Tripple ripple Queen out of you before you post again I think its making you edgy.
Jun 24, 2014
0
#5
ImNotaFish wrote:
Everyone I've seen here on chess thats 1600 or above is a good person. Everyone else needs work.
I figure Ill follow in the footsteps of my heroes.
-BTB(1st)
-Scott and his pet macer
Right now I suck at chess but If I can graduate with 1600 I Can tell everyone I know Proudly finally I got my Associates in Chess.
Then I can retire chess and begin honing my curling skills.
I had to play some crazy intellegent games to get where I am, Im going to post them in the hopes I get analysis to perfect my art (1600 strength).
All the games are 30 minute average (some 15)
Curling is an important skill!
Sure is!
ImNotaFish wrote:
Everyone I've seen here on chess thats 1600 or above is a good person. Everyone else needs work.
ImNotaFish wrote:
Right now I suck at chess but If I can graduate with 1600 I Can tell everyone I know Proudly finally I got my Associates in Chess.
Then I can retire chess and begin honing my curling skills.
SPOILERS!
---------------------------------------------------------------
When you get to 1600, you'll realize you're terrible, and "magically" you'll notice how those 1800 players are good, and how if you were only 1800...
And I hope I don't have to tell you what 1800 players are thinking 
---------------------------------------------------------------
In any case, good luck!
Whats the point of climbing the mountain if you never come back down! :D
It will end there. because According to the Russians 1600 knows how to play chess. I just want to get that far so when someone asks me " Do you know how to play chess?" I can say "DO I EVER!!!!"
I'm about to tell you the secret... get ready...
the secret is... win.. more.. games!
oh and the game analysis- 1st game = terrible. 2nd game = weak performance vs an even weaker opponent.
You should develop, castle, make fewer pawn moves in the opening and generally give some thought to king safety.
Yedddy I appreciate your worthless comments <1600 proves my point.
Scottrf what do you personally play in response to d4,e4?
ImNotaFish wrote:
Everyone I've seen here on chess thats 1600 or above is a good person. Everyone else needs work.
I figure Ill follow in the footsteps of my heroes.
-BTB(1st)
-Scott and his pet macer
Huh? Where did you get that from?
But either way, I'm glad that I'm one of your "heroes"!
Favorate Sicillian variation?
I didnt mean you. You're obviously "macer75".
:D
Jun 24, 2014
0
#18
JamieDelarosa wrote:
Why are those guys in the picture sweeping their teapots??
No, they're just keeping the ice clean. The teapots are for tea breaks.
Jamie Its called "Curling" Its an intensely confusing sport.
Everyone I've seen here on chess thats 1600 or above is a good person. Everyone else needs work.
I figure Ill follow in the footsteps of my heroes.
-BTB(1st)
-Scott and his pet macer
Right now I suck at chess but If I can graduate with 1600 I Can tell everyone I know Proudly finally I got my Associates in Chess.
Then I can retire chess and begin honing my curling skills.
I had to play some crazy intellegent games to get where I am, Im going to post them in the hopes I get analysis to perfect my art (1600 strength).
All the games are 30 minute average (some 15)