I played the hippo again tonight...I didn't record the game because of (insert excuse here) but I castled short, had the Knights on e7 and d7 and dual-fiancetto Bishops. It was a hard win...as she (my opponent) invaded with her Queen and Knight causing me to move the same Rook 4 or 5 times to avoid it from being captured. But! She allowed counterplay!! My Queen went in to check her King and come back to defend my own King and eventually she blundered somewhere and I ended up mating her.
The bottom line is this: Playing an opening like this (and winning!) would be a difficult task, if it weren't for books with GM experience. Now I can take my own experience from this game (Queen and Knight Invasion on the Queenside of the board) and watch for it in the next!
I agree with kleelof.
It is essential to play chess well first and than to play quickly. One quotation comes to my mind:
“Write quickly and you will never write well; write well, and you will soon write quickly.”
I am at the stage of 1400++ aiming to improve the skill to 1500 points as well. At this stage, playing more is not sufficient and even harmfull. You need to go through books, puzzles and other materials to get concentrated systematic experience.
I am reading "The process of Decision Making in Chess", which is a blueprient of evaluating any given position and making the optimal move. The next stage will be solving lots of tactical problems; later moving on into endgame, and then into openning.
In any case, simply playing many games, without thorough analysis (which most of us can't do properly), is not going to help.