I don't know who Michael Scott is, but i'm deeply offended (on behalf of people of profound mental retardation with a mental age of three years or below) that you would use the term idiot to describe him. It's offensive to idiots.
[clap... clap...] Brilliant. You must be very pleased with yourself, I'm sure.
But what the heck; I'll set aside your preference for out-dated psychological terms over the long-standing usage of the word in actual parlance (predating psychology altogether), play along and give you the point. It bolsters the crux of my argument anyway, which is that everyone is better served when people actually think about the traits they are trying to criticize long enough to be able to name them.
In other words, "I don't know who Michael Scott is, but his ideas on the utility of the word 'retard' seem pretty thoughtless to me." Fair enough.
So you think Down's Syndrome and retard are synonymous according to long standing usage in actual parlance? Methinks your criticism of Michael Scott is a little hypocritical there.
I don't know who Michael Scott is, but i'm deeply offended (on behalf of people of profound mental retardation with a mental age of three years or below) that you would use the term idiot to describe him. It's offensive to idiots.
[clap... clap...] Brilliant. You must be very pleased with yourself, I'm sure.
But what the heck; I'll set aside your preference for out-dated psychological terms over the long-standing usage of the word in actual parlance (predating psychology altogether), play along and give you the point. It bolsters the crux of my argument anyway, which is that everyone is better served when people actually think about the traits they are trying to criticize long enough to be able to name them.
In other words, "I don't know who Michael Scott is, but his ideas on the utility of the word 'retard' seem pretty thoughtless to me." Fair enough.