I think I cheated, I need chess.com to remove elo and make it a draw, or loss for myself.

Sort:
Avatar of BoardMonkey

You can throw your next game to make up for your win. Of course that would be sandbagging and I would be wrong for suggesting it. Ooh, no wonder cheating is wrong and we're not allowed to discuss it. Oooh.

Avatar of Chuck639

The Hans School of Chess….

Avatar of Wins

in b4 the lock.

Avatar of BoardMonkey

I fell victim to the Fried Liver Attack and froze for three whole minutes not knowing what to do. I knew I was in trouble and there was no way out of it. That three minutes must have been suspicious to my opponent. But then I came back with another stupid move and all was right in the world.

Good game Jordanohari.

 

Avatar of neatgreatfire
TheNameofNames wrote:

its not cheating stand your ground

yes it is lmao

the op used outside resources to win a game, literally cheating

Avatar of neatgreatfire
TheNameofNames wrote:

if you can learn how to apply a mating pattern in the allotted time its not considered cheating

So I'm allowed to use a tablebase during games to"learn" mating patterns or difficult endgames? Or maybe I'm allowed to use stockfish to "learn" the correct move during a game?

Avatar of xFallesafe
This post is a feat of breathtaking autism.
Avatar of Reggaenerick

Buy a chess board and give it to a random child on the street. Only then your sin will be forgiven. ;)

Avatar of BoardMonkey

Hey! I just got thumbs downed. What did I do wrong? Nevermind. Don't answer.

Avatar of Wins
BoardMonkey wrote:

I fell victim to the Fried Liver Attack and froze for three whole minutes not knowing what to do. I knew I was in trouble and there was no way out of it. That three minutes must have been suspicious to my opponent. But then I came back with another stupid move and all was right in the world.

Good game Jordanohari.

 

Not the fried liver, that's just the knight attack.

Qe7 is a terrible move, I think you realized it by now but your goal is to NOT lose, not minimise losses.

Your arent lost after ng5.

Avatar of BoardMonkey
Defaultedwastaken wrote:

 

Not the fried liver, that's just the knight attack.

Qe7 is a terrible move, I think you realized it by now but your goal is to NOT lose, not minimise losses.

Your arent lost after ng5.

I'm not minimizing it. I'm devestated. Yes, Qe7 was bad. Then Qxf7 was even worse. I have to look at this some more. I thought I was lost. I thought it was the Fried Liver.

My point is I didn't look anything up when I was in trouble. Looks like d5 would have been better. Are you sure it's not the Fried Liver?

Avatar of Wins
TheNameofNames wrote:
Defaultedwastaken wrote:
BoardMonkey wrote:

I fell victim to the Fried Liver Attack and froze for three whole minutes not knowing what to do. I knew I was in trouble and there was no way out of it. That three minutes must have been suspicious to my opponent. But then I came back with another stupid move and all was right in the world.

Good game Jordanohari.

 

Not the fried liver, that's just the knight attack.

Qe7 is a terrible move, I think you realized it by now but your goal is to NOT lose, not minimise losses.

Your arent lost after ng5.

there's d5 exd5 na5 bb5+ c6 dxc6 bxc6 and then your opponent probably blunders ba4 after h6  nf3 e4 ne5 qd4 forking the two pieces

After Bxc6

whites two moves are bd3 or be2.

and it is equal

Avatar of Viod43

up

Avatar of Wins
TheNameofNames wrote:
Defaultedwastaken wrote:
TheNameofNames wrote:
Defaultedwastaken wrote:
BoardMonkey wrote:

I fell victim to the Fried Liver Attack and froze for three whole minutes not knowing what to do. I knew I was in trouble and there was no way out of it. That three minutes must have been suspicious to my opponent. But then I came back with another stupid move and all was right in the world.

Good game Jordanohari.

 

Not the fried liver, that's just the knight attack.

Qe7 is a terrible move, I think you realized it by now but your goal is to NOT lose, not minimise losses.

Your arent lost after ng5.

there's d5 exd5 na5 bb5+ c6 dxc6 bxc6 and then your opponent probably blunders ba4 after h6  nf3 e4 ne5 qd4 forking the two pieces

Bxc6? who says bxc6 is the right move?

nononono, 

whites two moves are bd3 and be2.

bxc6 is the polerio

Yeah, I just realized that I got the mvoe worer wrong, I edited it and fixed it.

I thought bxc6 ment Bishop takes c6 by white.

Sorry.

Avatar of Wins
TheNameofNames wrote:

This is the qf3 line

Qf3 is hgihly playable / solid and reccomended by some players aswell.

This is the line I play into:

My oppnents arent good enoguh to play the bets moves, but the idea is not that white won't castle kingside but that if bxh3 and gxh3 you can put your bishop on f3 and then g2 to protect the king.

Higher level players like bd3, but all said are playable.

Avatar of Romans_5_8_and_8_5
TheNameofNames wrote:

This is the qf3 line

This is some of my knowledge I gained by studying the Fried Liver intensively. With these variations in mind, you pretty much already know most of the Fried Liver, one step closer to mastering the Italian Game. I know this is not entirely relevant to the OP's discussion at all, but this popped up and I want to give a little Fried Liver cheer.

Avatar of Romans_5_8_and_8_5
TheNameofNames wrote:

the op will never lose in the italian ever again lol

Yep. From one person's knowledge to the next. There's gotta be a few people who can really use my study.