"...yesterday i learned rook endgames philidor maneuver, lucena position, vancura position and french defense mcutcheon variation..."
All in 1 day. That may be a record. Someone call Guiness.
im really decided to take it seriously i have time i have energy, i need to solve tactics 10 hours a day? ill do it
yeah otb obsessed are back. online is good for practice top rising stars are playing here daily. example: Nihal Sarin. Bigfish. etc etc
"...yesterday i learned rook endgames philidor maneuver, lucena position, vancura position and french defense mcutcheon variation..."
All in 1 day. That may be a record. Someone call Guiness.
These days I just pour one instead ...
"...yesterday i learned rook endgames philidor maneuver, lucena position, vancura position and french defense mcutcheon variation..."
All in 1 day. That may be a record. Someone call Guiness.
The point was learning takes time. Sometimes we think we've learned something when we haven't. Try explaining the gist of what you've learned to someone.
"...yesterday i learned rook endgames philidor maneuver, lucena position, vancura position and french defense mcutcheon variation..."
All in 1 day. That may be a record. Someone call Guiness.
These days I just pour one instead ...
Amd sometimes, you have to po some out fo da homies
Hey FEF, do they also have an Award Certificate for losers? Or is that it?
Hey why aren't you learning something and becoming an fm? Everybody else is apparently ...
Almost forgot to add I learnt the Ace Ventura technique yesterday.
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
No one is taking you seriously because you haven't done anything to show you're serious. You didn't even ask how to get better, you asked how to get a title. There are tons of training resources on this website alone, and you're not using any of them. All you are doing is playing speed chess. So all that we see is words. There are tons of people posting on here every day, wanting some quick fix to be good at chess, but all they do is play blitz and bullet.
You, go learn something and become an IM! Now! Times a ticking ...
Again almost forgot to add that I just learned the 'you had me at hello' Gambit while I was typing this.
Hey FEF, do they also have an Award Certificate for losers? Or is that it?
Hey why aren't you learning something and becoming an fm? Everybody else is apparently ...
Almost forgot to add I learnt the Ace Ventura technique yesterday.
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
No one is taking you seriously because you haven't done anything to show you're serious. You didn't even ask how to get better, you asked how to get a title. There are tons of training resources on this website alone, and you're not using any of them. All you are doing is playing speed chess. So all that we see is words. There are tons of people posting on here every day, wanting some quick fix to be good at chess, but all they do is play blitz and bullet.
You, go learn something and become an IM! Now! Times a ticking ...
Again almost forgot to add that I just learned the 'you had me at hello' Gambit while I was typing this.
My chess raining is done for the day.
I counted to infinite...twice.
I believe in reps to failure. So I'll be learning the 'show me the money' position later today.
My chess training is done for the day.
I counted to infinite...twice.
I believe in reps to failure. So I'll be learning the 'show me the money' position later today.
"...yesterday i learned rook endgames philidor maneuver, lucena position, vancura position and french defense mcutcheon variation..."
All in 1 day. That may be a record. Someone call Guiness.
The point was learning takes time. Sometimes we think we've learned something when we haven't. Try explaining the gist of what you've learned to someone.
2300 vs 1700= rating difference 600. Prabability of winning from player A =95% , player B =5%
Not sure where you get 95%. On both the site you link, and the one I typically use (https://wismuth.com/elo/calculator.html#rating1=2300&rating2=1700) it gives just over 97%, but regardless, the point remains the same: if his online rate is an accurate reflection of his current strength, he would need to (effectively) double in strength to reach FM levels.
"If your strength is A, and your opponent's is B, and you are expected (for simplicity) to lose 100% of the time (or very close to it), then to reach strength B, you need to improve by 100% (double your current strength). ..." (~4 hours ago)
Would a player have to "(effectively) double in strength" to get from 1500 to 2100?
Would a player have to "(effectively) double in strength" to get from 2100 to 2700?
Would a player have to "(effectively) double in strength" to get from 1500 to 2700?
As far as I can tell, there is no generally accepted answer to this sort of question.
"... This book is the first volume in a series of manuals designed for players who are building the foundations of their chess knowledge. The reader will receive the necessary basic knowledge in six areas of the game - tactcs, positional play, strategy, the calculation of variations, the opening and the endgame. ... To make the book entertaining and varied, I have mixed up these different areas, ..." - GM Artur Yusupov
If you missed it, you might want to take a look at my post about 8 hours ago.
"...yesterday i learned rook endgames philidor maneuver, lucena position, vancura position and french defense mcutcheon variation..."
All in 1 day. That may be a record. Someone call Guiness.