... Would a player have to "(effectively) double in strength" to get from 1500 to 2700?
... it would be quadruple (if not more). ...
Would a 1500 player lose very close to 100% of the time against a 2700 player?
... Would a player have to "(effectively) double in strength" to get from 1500 to 2700?
... it would be quadruple (if not more). ...
Would a 1500 player lose very close to 100% of the time against a 2700 player?
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
In order to even start toward your objective, you must be objective about your current skills. Given that you were getting blow off the board by (online) 1400s as recently as March of this year, it would be highly unusual to improve by over 500 points of strength in the span of 2 months. The first step towards your stated goal is to obtain an official OTB rating.
since i have memory i have never be 1400 i think
You already forgot your 2nd and 3rd games back from an almost 5 year break?
The newest FM in my club got the title after between 1000 and 1100 Longchess rated games otb. I think he has been active in chess more than 8 years. He is 15 years old, and have been taking GM-lessons. His father is a good cluplayer.
As far as I can tell, there is no generally accepted answer to this sort of question.
"... This book is the first volume in a series of manuals designed for players who are building the foundations of their chess knowledge. The reader will receive the necessary basic knowledge in six areas of the game - tactcs, positional play, strategy, the calculation of variations, the opening and the endgame. ... To make the book entertaining and varied, I have mixed up these different areas, ..." - GM Artur Yusupov
If you missed it, you might want to take a look at my post about 8 hours ago.
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
In my opinion you have decent power, but longchess otb is like the Formula 1 in chess. The quality of the games are a lot higher than in blitz. Anyway, your blitzrating tell me that you have talent. It will be fun to see how much you can win if you play many longchess tournaments otb.
occz wrote: "... i will try to get the books!"
I wasn't trying to advocate any particular book. I was attempting to give some indication of the variety of attitudes towards chess study. Still, I suppose that a book might be helpful.
Several hours a day, for 5 days a week, for several years.
All of the above.
I'd say at least two hours of productive study a day. Three hours a day would be even better.
If you truly want to be FM, the most efficient path is to take lessons from a titled master.
lasker said anybody can become a master
Lasker was full of beans.
I belive he said "first category player"--whatever that meant. Not neccesarily master.
Yes, Andrew Tang became a GM by playing bullet online. 🙈
Andrew Tang has played in 286 USCF rated events, most of them weren't Blitz tournaments. He has also been coached by IM John Bartholomew. So You can't say that he became a GM just by playing bullet online. Also, Andrew Tang is probably not your ordinary chess player
You do realize I was being sarcastic?
Yes, Andrew Tang became a GM by playing bullet online. 🙈
Andrew Tang has played in 286 USCF rated events, most of them weren't Blitz tournaments. He has also been coached by IM John Bartholomew. So You can't say that he became a GM just by playing bullet online. Also, Andrew Tang is probably not your ordinary chess player
Yes, Andrew Tang became a GM by playing bullet online. 🙈
Andrew Tang has played in 286 USCF rated events, most of them weren't Blitz tournaments. He has also been coached by IM John Bartholomew. So You can't say that he became a GM just by playing bullet online. Also, Andrew Tang is probably not your ordinary chess player
i would like to play longer games but blitz is so addictive
Then expect your growth to be slow. If youre so easily "addicted" to things that you cant stop playing bullet/blitz for the sake of your wanted chess growth? How do you expect to reach your goal?
just play bullet as often you can and become a GM. ask GM Andrew Tang Penguingm1🐧 for more info.
Witout a doubt some of the worst advice to give someone that is trying to improve. If you are already an established titled player, then speed chess is fine. But...if youre trying to improve, and reach a title? Then playing bullet/blitz is the wrong advice to give.
... i live in a town that its too far away from chess tournaments so its dificult for me to do it, easier is to play onlone or train from my own
Have you considered doing long-time-control online games?