I won but had -.1 accuracy than my opponent???

Imagine this is a firefight and each of you shot 10 bullets. Your opponent hits you 4 times (missing 6), all in nonlethal areas while moving better through the battlefield, you hit your opponent with 2 bullets (missing 8), BUT one of your shots is lethal, ending the firefight.

You win the firefight for sure, but statistically speaking your opponent is a better shot. 

It's neither a bug nor glitch. Few people explained it to you well but you still seem like you dont understand. Accuracy is just a math of played moves in which outcome of the game doesn't matter. It's like ball possesion in soccer. You can be dominating from start to finish and just one mistake blews it all away. It doesnt mean you played poorly, you just had one bad move. If you want to win a chess game all you have to do is not to blunder last. I hope this helps. If not let me know which is your favourite sport so I can make some analogy with it.

It has to be a glitch. I highly doubt you could win with that level of comprehension capacity.

Ouch!

what is firefight???????

Gun fight

This is what happens when you bring a Bishop to a Knightfight.

Are you joking me.... not again            AGAIN?????? (Click the link)

not a rickroll guys don't worry

Why...... it happend to me again

what is a rickroll

Like a bed roll, but rickety.

I was about 15 points worse for accuracy than my opponent, but somehow pulled a swindle.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/320850832?tab=analysis

not true and it happend again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://www.chess.com/analysis?autorun=true&pgn=%5BEvent%20%22vs%20Computer%22%5D%0A%5BSite%20%22Chess.com%22%5D%0A%5BDate%20%222021.09.06%22%5D%0A%5BRound%20%22?%22%5D%0A%5BWhite%20%22HEDGIECHESS%22%5D%0A%5BBlack%20%22Wally%22%5D%0A%5BResult%20%221-0%22%5D%0A%5BTimeControl%20%22-%22%5D%0A%5BBlackElo%20%221233%22%5D%0A%5BWhiteElo%20%221800%22%5D%0A%0A1.%20e4%20e5%202.%20Nf3%20d6%203.%20Bc4%20Be7%204.%20Nc3%20Nc6%205.%20O-O%20Be6%206.%20Bb3%20Nd4%207.%20Nxd4%20exd4%208.%0ANd5%20c6%209.%20Nxe7%20Qxe7%2010.%20Bxe6%20Qxe6%2011.%20d3%20d5%2012.%20f3%20dxe4%2013.%20fxe4%20h5%2014.%20b3%20Ne7%0A15.%20Bb2%20c5%2016.%20b4%20cxb4%2017.%20Bxd4%20f6%2018.%20c3%20O-O-O%2019.%20Bxa7%20bxc3%2020.%20Rc1%20Qe5%2021.%0AQc2%20b5%2022.%20Qxc3%2B%20Qxc3%2023.%20Rxc3%2B%20Kd7%2024.%20Bb6%20Ra8%2025.%20Rc7%2B%20Ke6%2026.%20Ra1%20Rhc8%2027.%0ARxc8%20Rxc8%2028.%20Kf2%20Rc2%2B%2029.%20Kf3%20Rd2%2030.%20Bc5%20Rxd3%2B%2031.%20Ke2%20Rc3%2032.%20Bxe7%20Kxe7%2033.%0Aa4%20bxa4%2034.%20Rxa4%20Rc2%2B%2035.%20Kf3%20Ke6%2036.%20Ra6%2B%20Ke5%2037.%20Ra5%2B%20Ke6%2038.%20Ra6%2B%20Ke5%2039.%0ARa5%2B%20Ke6%2040.%20Rxh5%20Rc3%2B%2041.%20Kf4%20g5%2B%2042.%20Kg4%20Rc2%2043.%20g3%20Re2%2044.%20Kf3%20Ra2%2045.%20h4%20Ke5%0A46.%20hxg5%20Ra3%2B%2047.%20Kg4%20fxg5%2048.%20Rxg5%2B%20Kxe4%2049.%20Rg8%20Ra4%2050.%20Kh5%20Ra2%2051.%20g4%20Rh2%2B%0A52.%20Kg6%20Kf4%2053.%20g5%20Kg4%2054.%20Ra8%20Rc2%2055.%20Ra4%2B%20Kh3%2056.%20Kh7%20Rg2%2057.%20g6%20Kg3%2058.%20g7%0AKh3%2059.%20g8%3DQ%20Rxg8%2060.%20Kxg8%20Kg2%2061.%20Kf7%20Kf2%2062.%20Kf6%20Kf3%2063.%20Ke5%20Ke3%2064.%20Rd4%20Kf2%0A65.%20Ke4%20Kg3%2066.%20Kf5%20Kf3%2067.%20Re4%20Kf2%2068.%20Kf4%20Kg2%2069.%20Re3%20Kf2%2070.%20Re4%20Kg2%2071.%20Re2%2B%0AKg1%2072.%20Kf3%20Kf1%2073.%20Re3%20Kg1%2074.%20Re2%20Kf1%2075.%20Rf2%2B%20Ke1%2076.%20Ke3%20Kd1%2077.%20Re2%20Kc1%2078.%0ARd2%20Kb1%2079.%20Kd3%20Kc1%2080.%20Kc3%20Kb1%2081.%20Rc2%20Ka1%2082.%20Kb3%20Kb1%2083.%20Rc3%20Ka1%2084.%20Rc1%23%201-0&tab=report&referrer=vs-computer-game-report

When my computer gets done reading that gibberish, I may have a response.

your gibberish makes it hard to read

For example, if you were to be dominating a game with almost all best moves but simply blundering mate in one on the last move compared to an opponent that blundered everything but found mate, why would you give the person who luckily found mate a higher accuracy when they played terribly throughout almost the entire game

What's gibberish?

I made the gibberish bold