19708 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Stop with this crap already people, my God let it go.
I agree completely, the fact this "discussion" has went on for over 100 pages is just pathetic.
How so? Much in history are 'pathetic', as you call it. Why did the Roman Empire fell? Could Hitler have won WWII? etc etc. Books about Hitler and of WWII are in the millions. What's more challenging in chess history than this topic about Fischer and Karpov? Your local chess club, celebrating 20 years of active 'service', or what?
Discussing why and how things happened regarding historical events is entirely different. These discussions in chess about "who would win against who" when discussing players of different eras, or players who are dead, is 100% hypothetical and moot, there is no way to make progress in the discussion. It's just a mish-mash of "X is my favorite player, therefore X would win" or "Y played this opening/style, Z played this opening/style, therefore Z would win".
I don't know. This topic draws soo much interest beyond fandom, idolizing and obsession. Of course it's a hypothetical conversation. But between a player at the height of his illustrious journey to the WC, after many years of setbacks, "conspiracies", going through hoops ever since he was fifteen. An up-n-coming young challenger. The perennial product of the Soviet cog groomed to take back the crown from the Yankee upstart.
The implications, as Morra opined, had Karpov won against Fischer are intriguing. It may have better prepared him, added much validity to his self-esteem knowing he had bested Bobby and wasn't the default Champion going into his future matches with Kasparov.
I believe history would've been different from then on.
Likewise, if they had played and Bobby, without a doubt in my mind, beat Karpov...could well as have the legendary career that the two K's enjoyed.
Ah, what might have been.
An analogy would be the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight.
It never happened five years ago (maybe more) and many were disappointed, speculated about the outcome.
Fortunately, they did fight. Yet some still speculate about the rematch. I don't think it's at all pathetic to discuss the many possibilities of such a game between them. They were roughly the same age (5-7yrs differential) playing strong chess. But they had differing styles and to me more than enough juice to call such a match Epic. I think that's worth discussing even though Bobby's gone. We have, because of the internet, many resources, information, game scores from 1975, to draw from. To make reasonable deductions for ourselves to at least debate about the outcome.
Perhaps it was good that Bobby Fischer disappeared from the chess world. It gave a chance for Korchnoi to shine. I mean, the '74 and '78 Karpov - Korchnoi encounters were fantastic. And the fact that Korchnoi qualified to be the challenger once again in 1981 - when he was 49 or 50 years old, is also remarkable - despite the fact that he was massacred by Karpov. Korchnoi is also one of my favorite players - a true old fighter of the 64 squares. :)
Fischer was a great chess player but as a person a total cockhead
Heh. Some would consider and observe, Garry's many antics, shenanigans during his career as douchy. That he was overambitious enough, self-entitled to be a more of a c__khead than Bobby may have been. Ever.
5/24/2016 - V. Korchnoi-V.Chekhover, USSR Ch semi-final 1951
by saidou111 a few minutes ago
#2 Beginners: The Opening!
by Mal_Smith a few minutes ago
how to be happy?
by gerberk 4 minutes ago
Your game deeply annotated by a GM
by Aravindsomaraj 4 minutes ago
Will computers ever solve chess?
by s23bog 4 minutes ago
Why can't you take your own pieces?
by notmtwain 10 minutes ago
Need Help !!!!!!
by thegreat_patzer 10 minutes ago
by Aravindsomaraj 11 minutes ago
Why do people play 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 2 exd5?!
by jengaias 11 minutes ago
by gerberk 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!