But he's already spent over a year on "strategic"...I can just see him now thumbing forlornly through the Webster's trying to find "infinite regress" (actually, that's probably why his time is running out).
I thought we had established that there was no "solution" to this thread. 28 pages and he's still trying to figure out what strategy is. He's obviously a troll.
That said, I do want to see this game finish. If I'm stopping that, I guess that sucks.
i read your comment eebster,but i cannot understand what are you saying.some of your words is to profound,can you give me a simple example in the sentence about what is the difference between the word strategic and strategy.I WAIT TO YOUR RESPONSE AGAIN EEBSTER.
Oh great, now you've done it Eebster (the poor guy's head is gonna explode).
Hey, Derrida isn't too hard. All he is saying is that absolute positive obligations lead to infinite regress and aporia since we cannot simultaneously satisfy the absolute obligations to the Other and to all the other Others.
Or something like that. :)
Kurogkug, that post has absolutely nothing to do with strategy, except to the extent that an effective policymaking strategy should not employ absolute positive obligations.
Have I made things better?