if you know

Sort:
Eebster
tonydal wrote:
Eebster wrote:

kurogkug would make a good philosopher.

Philosophers are supposed to ask questions, right?


Actually, he's an e e cummings sort of philosopher (one without a shift key).


Apparently E. E. Cummings didn't write his own name in lowercase, his publisher did. Not sure why.

Cystem_Phailure

Maybe he figured the material was weak and they needed a marketing gimmick . . .  there's certainly a lot of that going on now, especially in the pop music world.

taots_11

thank you borgqueen.

chessroboto
kurogkug wrote:

thank you borgqueen.


That's it?!

Which one are you going with for endgame training?

planeden

hahaha, the old thread got revived.  gotta love it. 

planeden
BorgQueen wrote:

No the revival comes when he asks a new question :-)

You're welcome K.


i meant the one from 2008 or whenever.  he asked a new question in there and everything.

kco

maybe he is just slowing down this thread trying to speed up the other one

-X-

Maybe borgqueen's advice isn't working for him so he thought he'd give tonydal another try.Laughing

theoreticalboy

Hah, I just noticed kurokug and borgqueen played a game that lasted all of 5 moves.  There's something poetic about that.

thegab03

Who's a clever Trevor? yo!

chessroboto

Has this thread discussed SACRIFICES yet?

-X-

So much for a 2 year wrap-up.

Eebster
tonydal wrote:

lol...wait'll kurogkug gets to overprotection (2 or 3 years and I still don't know what that one means).


I always thought overprotecting a piece just meant having more defenders than attackers (e.g. if white opened 1. e4 e5 2. d4 Nf6 Nf3, he would be overprotecting his d pawn (but leaving his e pawn en prise). Is there a more subtle meaning I am missing?

-X-
Eebster wrote:
tonydal wrote:

lol...wait'll kurogkug gets to overprotection (2 or 3 years and I still don't know what that one means).


I always thought overprotecting a piece just meant having more defenders than attackers (e.g. if white opened 1. e4 e5 2. d4 Nf6 Nf3, he would be overprotecting his d pawn (but leaving his e pawn en prise). Is there a more subtle meaning I am missing?


 What you're forgetting is that you just went through two years worth of explaining and re-explaining with that last post of yours.

taots_11

hi borgqueen,i have a question.i don't understand this,we know that kramnik is the word champion right?.how come magnus carlsen is the one who gonna play against the world or magnus carlsen vs the world?.i wait again to your response borgqueen.

chessroboto
kurogkug wrote:

hi borgqueen,i have a question.i don't understand this,we know that kramnik is the word champion right?.how come magnus carlsen is the one who gonna play against the world or magnus carlsen vs the world?.i wait again to your response borgqueen.


Hey BQ! Guess who's back?

Albeit the new question sounds more confused than inquiring. It could have been the alcohol though.

kco

Right now Anand Viswanathan is the current World Championship

taots_11

thank you borgqueen.yeah may be ha? i understand?.the reason i ask you this is  because when the world champion before is kasparov he played vs the world.anyway i have another question,and again i want you to not to think that i want to go back in our bad days before,because if you remember my question before that the sentence ''its of strategic importants that we capture this island'' and your answer is because ''its involve in the plan of the general to capture the island'' and you are right.so my question is ''if i can say too that the island is involve in the strategy of the general or not''?,i mean i just want to change the word ''plan'' in the sentence with the word ''strategy''.is this is wrong or not?.i wait again to your answer borgqueen.

planeden

they must not be part of the collective. 

taots_11

thank you borgqueen.

This forum topic has been locked