If you were to play the "devil's advocate", could you justify this opening (Latvian Gamit)?

Sort:
kingdamian1

null

So this opening is called the Latvian Gambit. Can you find ANY justification for it? Is it immediately terrible move?

kingdamian1

I find this opening funny

MitSud
Played against it plenty of times, being a person who knows 0 theory I just play the best move that pops into my head
MitSud
Usually works
kindaspongey

Awhile ago, Kosten wrote The Latvian Gambit Lives!.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627060512/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen30.pdf

Nunn commented on the book in Secrets of Practical Chess (2nd Ed.).

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708094733/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/secprac.txt

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708110907/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review580.pdf

hosnes

for me, blacks must give one pawn on starts, nice opening