Computers are strong. But people can beat it especially on long time control (not blitz, because computers calculations isn't affecting in fast time and doesn't even feel pressure)
Impossible to beat Computer
Sort:
dwaxe wrote:
Try doing that against Fritz, Rybka, or Shredder at full power...
+1
I Try to look at these shuffle chess Tournaments I create at Scid.
Analyze with them..>
Than try to Adopt these moves Stockfish 2.2.2 and Critter 1.6a make.
Feeling. Feeling against Rybka 2.3.2a mp 32-bit
No. It doesn't work like that. Sometimes nearly all The moves seem ( so ) Logical. Still.
My Tactic suck I do not like.
Have an Opening advantage of -1,00; No matter, if you are bussy with thinking Strategically ahead, where are the Pragmatic Tactics in your Head?
Advantage not Maintained. Can you do both?
Surprise (: What??! I didn't saw that Candidate move!!.. for myself.
With an instable Morale from nature, Perfectionism, it will be hard to Continue. Don't continue. Even drawish.
Look for the straw! What is Kasparov? What is Fischer? What is the Rest?
photographic Memory? Not only.
Look for the straw. Advantage Maintained.
mandelshtam wrote:
maniac2008 wrote:
yeah ofcourse any computer can be beaten somehow ... but computers are gettin stronger and stronger and i think 1 day they will be so good even the greatest chess players will not be able 2 beat them what u think??
I think you didn't get my point: the COMBINATION of human PLUS program is MUCH stronger than any program (or ANY combination of (two or more) programs), because they (the programs) have the brute force, and we have the intuition.
this Deutsche Man/Woman is right for sure.
The Chess Programs are Master-Tacticians and should Definetly be used, and not be under-Valued at those Typical Complex Tactical Puzzle Positions that you get Trown at from Compositors.
Whereas Humans Should be used for Silent, Strategicall Positions where there are no Clear attacking Lines, and Intuition may be used. Where not the Best move Counts, but the lesser, long-Term Strategical move. The investment-move.
A thumb-of-Rule sign when a GrandMaster may Doubt about a Machine's Analysis, is when the ( a part of ) Pawn Sturcture is Frozen. Position Closed, or semi-Closed.
nyLsel wrote:
Computers are strong. But people can beat it especially on long time control (not blitz, because computers calculations isn't affecting in fast time and doesn't even feel pressure)
If their tactical analysis is off at all. They will lose. The computers strategy my be, well probably about where my low 1300 ranking is. But it's tactics are so perfect for the next 10 moves. Good luck.
beatable by another unbeatable chess machine of that kind it is versing
beatable by another unbeatable chess machine of that kind it is versing
Rybka vs. Rybka
You beat a computer on hard easily? Are we talking Chess titans?