22508 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Almost everybody here thinks it's impossible for him to reach 2400 fide rating, maybe 2000, or even 1600 sometimes, without to be a genius. They all speak about talent, luck or other magic stuff, and think they will never improve. Then I decided to share my opinion on this important subject.
My idea is : everybody could reach 2000. I did and I'm not a special guy. I'm not talking about 2400 because some people are gonna tell me I'm not 2400, which is true, but I think it's the same for 2400, almost everybody can reach 2400 if he wants to.
How did I reach 2000 ? Very simple, I played OTB long games with strong opponents. I also played blitz and rapid, red some few chess books/reviews but not carefully at all, I just red what I wanted to read, not to improve but because I like the game, and never take it as a work. But that's not the point. The 3 mains things people always forget, are
By 'long game' I mean 4h games (2h for each), or even slowly. By 'strong opponents' I mean opponents who are 300 or 500 points higher than ourselves.
After you reach 1800 or 2000, you can (and must) begin to really work ('work' is what we normally don't do and don't like, what we need to do and what we do when we want to improve after 2000/2200/2400 level, because this is the level where the wish of being strong become more important than the wish of never 'work') with books or coaches.
Of course you have to love the game, analyse your losses and ask many many advices to stronger players. And I'm not saying books are useless when you're under 2000, every GM had read some chess paper even when he was 1500, like everybody does. But before 1800 or even 2200 you really don't need to 'work', you just need to play OTB, LONG GAMES, and STRONG OPPONENTS.
thankya man this may be useful...
...and lots of tactics.
If everyone was 2000+, who would we make fun of?
People who are more (or less) nerdy than ourselves.
Thanks for your ideas. About how long did it take you to go from 1500 to over 1900?
From the start to over 1900 : 50 long OTB games (the great majority of them against strong opponents).
I think you mean, "whom would us make fun have".
Ending sentences with prepositions is something up with which I will not put!
"Nakamura vs Vachier-Lagrave: GM Blitz Battle Chess"
8/24/2016 - Shock And Awe
by bestpony 3 minutes ago
the blind leading the blind,
by ReddyJ 6 minutes ago
Chess legends. Where would be Carlson's position in a list?
by marcusrg 7 minutes ago
¡Miren el Libro! ¡Look at the Book! por GMI Salo Flohr
by Arisktotle 11 minutes ago
how do you change youre uscf raTing on chess.com
by ChessOfPlayer 11 minutes ago
My first 5-mins blitz game in some time!
by Pulpofeira 12 minutes ago
why in berlin main line you trade fat pawn for knight?
by trollmickey 16 minutes ago
1400 in blitz!
by newengland7 18 minutes ago
theres this guy really similar to bobby fischer in the olmypics
by trollmickey 18 minutes ago
Have lost almost 100 rating points
by ZerglingRush 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!