14128 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In our Sunday paper is Shelby Lyman on Chess in which there is always a problem for the beginner. My opinion of a beginner must not be the same as his, because some of those problems seem difficult for what I consider to be a beginner. In your opinion, when does a beginner graduate from being a beginner?
White will always be the beginner
How do you define a beginner?
What do they graduate to?
That's not fair answering my question with a question, but I always thought of a beginner as someone who has just learned the laws, moves of the chessmen and still struggling with what to do next, such as, push a pawn or what? But it seems liie a fine line as to when a person is not any longer a beginner.
I like your humor.
There's a difference between being a beginner and simply being quite bad at chess. There's also a difference between the average chess player and someone who calls his playing strength "average"
And a difference between considering youself a strong player and being a strong player
I agree with what you wrote, but that does not answer my question. Yes, one may not be a beginner, but a very weak player, but somewhere there must be a point where he/she is not considered a beginner. Such as, learning to drive. We usually think once a person graduates from a driving permit by passing the final driving test and receiving a driver's license he is considered a driver. Not a stockcar race driver, but a driver no less.
Yes, isn't it true. I remember a man that joined a small chess group I was in once. He came in telling how he was once in a chess tourament. As it turned out he was in a neighborhood type tournament. He didn't last long in the group.
Then there was a man I met in a library as I sat a chessboard waiting for anyone that would play. He asked if I was waiting on anyone, and I said no and asked him if he played. He only answered, "Some." He beat me all four games. I held my own until the endgames. He was much better in the endgames. His some proved to be devastrating to me.
Yes, this idea of a driver's license vs. a chess "license" has been keeping me awake as well. I don't know yet how to compare the two.
I'd say your a beginner until you win at least three times against an opponent of 1800 or better by executinging and caring out a plan and not by luck.
Which I haven't managed to do even once yet.
Wow, that is very stringent. Isn't that sort of saying one isn't a driver until he/she has driven through New York City during the rush-hour? If that be the case, many chess players are hopelessly beginners.
I know, I asked for your opinion, and that is your opinion. I guess I passed, because I once beat a 2000 by very determined planning and execution. I could beat him about 1 out of nine times. I have no rating.
If drivers are undecided like chess players, they'd cause an accident at every second junction
I'd say you're a beginner until you know some basic principles of each phase of the game, and you're familiar with and utilize in play common tactical motives.
I had one this weekend! Ended up in a ditch.
1. Car to J9??
My car is supposed to move like a rook and it ended up more like a knight.
Now we are getting somewhere. Yes, one can know these things and not ever become a strong player, yet is beyond the beings a beginner. Back to relating this to driving. One can know how to maneuver a curve, drive on ice, parallel park, etc., yet not be able to drive a truck on the ice-highway in Alaska.
Defining a when a beginner creases being a beginner in many cases is as difficult as defining when one enters the middle game. No two games are ever exactly alike.
I can relate to that!
Yes, something like that, dropping pieces left and right. Rd4?? Nxd4 which leaves some indentation to the side of the rook
Once you become a C class player, i think its safe to say youre no longer a beginner.
What's a class C player?
This would explain why someone writes that being a beginner help is needed, yet when checking the person's rating it is in this range. To me this is not at beginner. Not a strong player, yes, but not a beginner. I suppose the higher one's rating is the beginner level raises with his/her rating of a beginner. I wonder, do GMs look at C-players as beginners?
by Jenium a few minutes ago
5/27/2016 - Straight Checks
by alexdora 7 minutes ago
Ducky is back!
by theconciser 8 minutes ago
Will computers ever solve chess?
by RoepStoep 15 minutes ago
Can women be as good at chess?
by Elubas 16 minutes ago
Why play the Colle?
by SaintGermain32105 19 minutes ago
Scid vs PC ... "pgnscid" utility
by sarajevo1969 22 minutes ago
All my Nimzo Indian Life has been a lie?
by TwoMove 24 minutes ago
Chess.com old version
by baddogno 36 minutes ago
Learning the London System.
by a10pro 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!