is 2200 a good rating?

yeah this is a joke, i've been hanging pieces and 1600 blitz players still lose when up a whole piece, makes no sense
Face it, dude! You're very good at chess! Embrace that fact that you are in the 99.9% percentile!
I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E6%9C%BD%E6%9C%A8%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E9%9B%95

please don't report me
i did it, but in case you are cheating chess.com won’t detect it since you wouldn’t be using stockfish at max lvl
My account is still open so I'm not a cheater.

Yeh, Hikaru treats people rated like 2600 as having a “pathetic rating”
True. There are levels to this game.
2600s stomp most players.
2900s stomp most 2600s.
Then you have Hikaru, who plays intentionally bad moves against 2900s, just so he'll feel less bored while stomping them ...

Depends on who you ask. Ask a 100 and they'll tell you that 2200 is grandmaster level. Ask a 1000 and they'll tell you that 2200 is a very good rating. Ask a 2800 and they'll tell you that 2200 is pathetic.

please don't report me
i did it, but in case you are cheating chess.com won’t detect it since you wouldn’t be using stockfish at max lvl
My account is still open so I'm not a cheater.
That's what a cheater would say 🤔

2200 is not necessarily a good rating, unless it is Rapid.
People improve extremely fast and get very high ratings in blitz and bullet, mostly because they require less skill than Rapid.
So I would say no.
hahaha wat

Depends on who you ask. Ask a 100 and they'll tell you that 2200 is grandmaster level. Ask a 1000 and they'll tell you that 2200 is a very good rating. Ask a 2800 and they'll tell you that 2200 is pathetic.
Hmm, idk, i kinda imagine that there isn't much difference between what 2200 feels like to 100 and to 1000

If you play a lot of rapid and that's how you compare yourself to others that's fine... but you don't play rapid...
mhm
