is 2200 a good rating?

Sort:
ice_cream_cake

mhm

slwmotion
Definitely
ice_cream_cake

sounds familiar

ice_cream_cake
ehm42 写道:
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:

yeah this is a joke, i've been hanging pieces and 1600 blitz players still lose when up a whole piece, makes no sense

Face it, dude! You're very good at chess! Embrace that fact that you are in the 99.9% percentile!

I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E6%9C%BD%E6%9C%A8%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E9%9B%95

Unicorn_Horn12
SnowDae wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 escribió:

please don't report me

i did it, but in case you are cheating chess.com won’t detect it since you wouldn’t be using stockfish at max lvl

My account is still open so I'm not a cheater.

sndeww

2200 isn’t a good rating, but 2209 is.

MaetsNori
ehm42 wrote:

Yeh, Hikaru treats people rated like 2600 as having a “pathetic rating”

True. There are levels to this game.

2600s stomp most players.

2900s stomp most 2600s.

Then you have Hikaru, who plays intentionally bad moves against 2900s, just so he'll feel less bored while stomping them ...

Unicorn_Horn12
B1ZMARK wrote:

2200 isn’t a good rating, but 2209 is.

Dang, just 1 away...

Unicorn_Horn12

#actuallysick

so going back to bed...

PromisingPawns

🎉

Kyobir

Depends on who you ask. Ask a 100 and they'll tell you that 2200 is grandmaster level. Ask a 1000 and they'll tell you that 2200 is a very good rating. Ask a 2800 and they'll tell you that 2200 is pathetic.

SnowDae
Unicorn_Horn12 escribió:
SnowDae wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 escribió:

please don't report me

i did it, but in case you are cheating chess.com won’t detect it since you wouldn’t be using stockfish at max lvl

My account is still open so I'm not a cheater.

That's what a cheater would say 🤔

ice_cream_cake
Winner-4Ever 写道:

2200 is not necessarily a good rating, unless it is Rapid.

People improve extremely fast and get very high ratings in blitz and bullet, mostly because they require less skill than Rapid.

So I would say no.

hahaha wat

ice_cream_cake
Kyobir 写道:

Depends on who you ask. Ask a 100 and they'll tell you that 2200 is grandmaster level. Ask a 1000 and they'll tell you that 2200 is a very good rating. Ask a 2800 and they'll tell you that 2200 is pathetic.

Hmm, idk, i kinda imagine that there isn't much difference between what 2200 feels like to 100 and to 1000

Unicorn_Horn12

For low ratings, rapid is usually the highest, and pros don't even play rapid so...

Unicorn_Horn12

If you play a lot of rapid and that's how you compare yourself to others that's fine... but you don't play rapid...

Unicorn_Horn12

I'd be surprised if a 2200 3+0 player couldn't get to at least 2000 in 10+0 games.

ice_cream_cake

blitz is hard

MaetsNori
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:

I'd be surprised if a 2200 3+0 player couldn't get to at least 2000 in 10+0 games.

Logically speaking, a 2200 Blitz player should play even stronger in Rapid, since they have more time to think ...

PromisingPawns

Iron steam i found that it was not the case. The rapid pool is stronger and requires more effort per game to win