It's mostly how quickly can you make moves which don't let someone mate you within 1 minute lol
Is Bullet Actually Chess?
Sort:
No. I'll explain in monkey to you.
NO!! Bullet no chess. Chess is think. When fast too no think about move. Brain is too scared of losing no time. Brain no comprehend what happening. Make random move. If have a longer period like 3 min might be better. But bullet no chess. Hope that helped.
That triggered my OCD, lol
deafeyes0 wrote:
No. I'll explain in monkey to you.
NO!! Bullet no chess. Chess is think. When fast too no think about move. Brain is too scared of losing no time. Brain no comprehend what happening. Make random move. If have a longer period like 3 min might be better. But bullet no chess. Hope that helped.
I don't understand Monkeynese. 💀
Scemer wrote:
deafeyes0 wrote:
No. I'll explain in monkey to you.
NO!! Bullet no chess. Chess is think. When fast too no think about move. Brain is too scared of losing no time. Brain no comprehend what happening. Make random move. If have a longer period like 3 min might be better. But bullet no chess. Hope that helped.
I don't understand Monkeynese. 💀
Lmao, I do 💀
I think bullet is not chess because to win at bullet, an intelligent person would use a different method. All it is is reaction speed and memorisation. Nothing more.
GMs just play it for a laugh.
Simple... it's ego chess
Scemer wrote:
The classification of Bullet Chess as true Chess is subjective. Some argue its fast pace changes the game, while others believe the core rules and objectives remain, thus it's Chess. I want to hear your opinion; do you think Bullet is Chess, or not?
This is my dumb 700 bullet opinion, but I feel like its still chess
Its just fast paced. While 600 bullet chess may look like a random chess game out of diarrhea land; when GMs play bullet, it looks like a game that 2000s play in rapid.
It does change the game, but its still chess.
Yes... and should be called ego chess
960 and 4 player's far more chess, even the only one min. and 15 sec. delay with 4 player, considering more opponents are involved than just 2. I think a proper game of live chess should at least be 15 min., but because so many are wrapped up into moving ridiculously fast its nearly impossible finding a 15 min. seek. =/
Yes it's most definitely is chess, the better you get the more bullet becomes chess when beginning it's basically you just pushing wood though, certainly gives you an advantage when playing rapid again you save a lot of time
Nov 10, 2023
0
#17
2000Knights wrote:
Scemer wrote:
The classification of Bullet Chess as true Chess is subjective. Some argue its fast pace changes the game, while others believe the core rules and objectives remain, thus it's Chess. I want to hear your opinion; do you think Bullet is Chess, or not?
This is my dumb 700 bullet opinion, but I feel like its still chess
Its just fast paced. While 600 bullet chess may look like a random chess game out of diarrhea land; when GMs play bullet, it looks like a game that 2000s play in rapid.
It does change the game, but its still chess.
Yes I agree
No.
Next question.
obviously its chess. you can make ideas, find tactics, do whatever (if you can't, it doesn't mean others can't as well). the only difference is that there is a clock, you can use this clock to your advantage at times
The classification of Bullet Chess as true Chess is subjective. Some argue its fast pace changes the game, while others believe the core rules and objectives remain, thus it's Chess. I want to hear your opinion; do you think Bullet is Chess, or not?