Is chess a sport?

Sort:
Avatar of lfPatriotGames
Ziryab wrote:
lfPatriotGames wrote:

Chess is a sport in the same way a circle is a square.

 Absurd.

 

Chess is widely viewed as a sport in many parts of the world. But most people think of sports as involving competition where the emphasis is on physical agility and/or strength. Hence, the dictionary definition that dull plodders will turn to must be stretched a bit in order to accommodate more flexible usage.

Happily, the etymology of sport helps the word stretch in this manner. However, it runs the risk of allowing all sorts of amusements, even tiddlywinks.

What we need are better lexicographers.

I guess it all depends on how you define "absurd". The people who think chess is a sport could easily argue a circle is a square. They are both shapes, they both have the same number of letters, they both are used in geometry, and they both aren't triangles. The similarities are so striking, there is no good reason to not call a circle a square (other than the definitions of course)

Avatar of IWantToBeSmart

I personally would not classify it as a sport, but, by definition, it is one. Sport: an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment. Exertion: physical or mental effort.

Avatar of Caesar49bc

I like to think of chess as art. Combinations can be a beautiful thing.

Avatar of badenwurtca
PawnstormPossie wrote:

Every couple of months, someone asks this same question.

It's easy to research the definittion of a sport and compare it to the definition of chess.

There shouldn't be any debate on the matter.

"Recognize", "consider", or "view" it however you like.

   ---   Yes indeed I recently learned about the folly of starting up a thread on this subject. You would not believe the gigantic amount of stupidity that I had to put up with in that thread, Good luck to the OP with this project ( be warned however that you might end up in therapy  lol ).

Avatar of nrtaylor210

Sure looks like a sport to me.  More politics than the NFL and FIFA combined...

Avatar of Kowalski_x

Ziryab wrote:

lfPatriotGames wrote:

Chess is a sport in the same way a circle is a square.

 Absurd.

 

Chess is widely viewed as a sport in many parts of the world. But most people think of sports as involving competition where the emphasis is on physical agility and/or strength. Hence, the dictionary definition that dull plodders will turn to must be stretched a bit in order to accommodate more flexible usage.

Happily, the etymology of sport helps the word stretch in this manner. However, it runs the risk of allowing all sorts of amusements, even tiddlywinks.

What we need are better lexicographers.

Self righteous much? Where's the Ziryab edition of the dictionary? Can't wait for that publication. I hate to break it to you but the meaning of words are kind of agreed by many and the Oxford Dictionary lexicographers are surely more qualified than some rando in a chess forum. LUL

Avatar of Ziryab
Kowalski_x wrote:

 

Ziryab wrote:

 

lfPatriotGames wrote:

Chess is a sport in the same way a circle is a square.

 Absurd.

 

Chess is widely viewed as a sport in many parts of the world. But most people think of sports as involving competition where the emphasis is on physical agility and/or strength. Hence, the dictionary definition that dull plodders will turn to must be stretched a bit in order to accommodate more flexible usage.

Happily, the etymology of sport helps the word stretch in this manner. However, it runs the risk of allowing all sorts of amusements, even tiddlywinks.

What we need are better lexicographers.

 

Self righteous much? Where's the Ziryab edition of the dictionary? Can't wait for that publication. I hate to break it to you but the meaning of words are kind of agreed by many and the Oxford Dictionary lexicographers are surely more qualified than some rando in a chess forum. LUL

 

 

Your asinine comment barely deserves a reply. But, as others also read this thread, ...

Please reread what I said about etymology and then read the Oxford dictionary entry: https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/187476

That's not the dictionary the dull plodders are citing.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, chess fit easily within the definition with sport.

I readily admit that one can find many dictionary definitions that are less accommodating because the lexicographers of those texts aim at reductionist definitions. The scholars who edit the OED are less facile.

Avatar of Kowalski_x

Ziryab wrote:

Kowalski_x wrote:

 

Ziryab wrote:

 

lfPatriotGames wrote:

Chess is a sport in the same way a circle is a square.

 Absurd.

 

Chess is widely viewed as a sport in many parts of the world. But most people think of sports as involving competition where the emphasis is on physical agility and/or strength. Hence, the dictionary definition that dull plodders will turn to must be stretched a bit in order to accommodate more flexible usage.

Happily, the etymology of sport helps the word stretch in this manner. However, it runs the risk of allowing all sorts of amusements, even tiddlywinks.

What we need are better lexicographers.

 

Self righteous much? Where's the Ziryab edition of the dictionary? Can't wait for that publication. I hate to break it to you but the meaning of words are kind of agreed by many and the Oxford Dictionary lexicographers are surely more qualified than some rando in a chess forum. LUL

 

 

Your asinine comment barely deserves a reply. But, as others also read this thread, ...

Please reread what I said about etymology and then read the Oxford dictionary entry: https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/187476

That's not the dictionary the dull plodders are citing.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, chess fit easily within the definition with sport.

I readily admit that one can find many dictionary definitions that are less accommodating because the lexicographers of those texts aim at reductionist definitions. The scholars who edit the OED are less facile.

This guy cannot read LOL It even states in OED that in "MODERN" usage - sport is defined as a physical exertion and skill. (PLEASE SEE #4 in his link) That is WHY so many "dull plodders" find on a quick search. Because.... HELLO we live in the now.... the last few hundred years. Anybody there old timer? ANYTHING could be counted as a sport if you go back far enough in its usage. The OED link he provides contains all recorded uses of sport throughout history duhhhh. Many which are obsolete or rare. Seems like Ziryab's reading comprehension is as antiquated as his usage of the term sport. (Use the scroll function buddy) My initial response was barely worthy of a reply from you? Yup... What a self righteous egomaniac.

Avatar of lfPatriotGames

Kowalski

What is obvious to the vast majority isn't so obvious to the small minority. There are still people who dont care what the definition of words are. I think most of the people who say chess is a sport dont really believe it. They are just trying to start an argument.

The people who think the definition of words include descriptions from 200 years ago aren't living in the present. Even the title of this topic should be a clue. "Is chess a sport" Not "was chess a sport". Maybe Ziryab doesn't understand that definitions of words change over time. Right now, there is no question, chess is not a sport. By definition.

Avatar of Ziryab
Kowalski_x wrote:

 

Ziryab wrote:

 

Kowalski_x wrote:

 

Ziryab wrote:

 

lfPatriotGames wrote:

Chess is a sport in the same way a circle is a square.

 Absurd.

 

Chess is widely viewed as a sport in many parts of the world. But most people think of sports as involving competition where the emphasis is on physical agility and/or strength. Hence, the dictionary definition that dull plodders will turn to must be stretched a bit in order to accommodate more flexible usage.

Happily, the etymology of sport helps the word stretch in this manner. However, it runs the risk of allowing all sorts of amusements, even tiddlywinks.

What we need are better lexicographers.

 

Self righteous much? Where's the Ziryab edition of the dictionary? Can't wait for that publication. I hate to break it to you but the meaning of words are kind of agreed by many and the Oxford Dictionary lexicographers are surely more qualified than some rando in a chess forum. LUL

 

 

Your asinine comment barely deserves a reply. But, as others also read this thread, ...

Please reread what I said about etymology and then read the Oxford dictionary entry: https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/187476

That's not the dictionary the dull plodders are citing.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, chess fit easily within the definition with sport.

I readily admit that one can find many dictionary definitions that are less accommodating because the lexicographers of those texts aim at reductionist definitions. The scholars who edit the OED are less facile.

 

This guy cannot read LOL It even states in OED that in "MODERN" usage - sport is defined as a physical exertion and skill. (PLEASE SEE #4 in his link) That is WHY so many "dull plodders" find on a quick search. Because.... HELLO we live in the now.... the last few hundred years. Anybody there old timer? ANYTHING could be counted as a sport if you go back far enough in its usage. The OED link he provides contains all recorded uses of sport throughout history duhhhh. Many which are obsolete or rare. Seems like Ziryab's reading comprehension is as antiquated as his usage of the term sport. (Use the scroll function buddy) My initial response was barely worthy of a reply from you? Yup... What a self righteous egomaniac.

 

 

Now, you've succeeded in summarizing my original post, albeit with twice the verbiage. 

Avatar of Kowalski_x

Ziryab wrote:

Kowalski_x wrote:

 

Ziryab wrote:

 

Kowalski_x wrote:

 

Ziryab wrote:

 

lfPatriotGames wrote:

Chess is a sport in the same way a circle is a square.

 Absurd.

 

Chess is widely viewed as a sport in many parts of the world. But most people think of sports as involving competition where the emphasis is on physical agility and/or strength. Hence, the dictionary definition that dull plodders will turn to must be stretched a bit in order to accommodate more flexible usage.

Happily, the etymology of sport helps the word stretch in this manner. However, it runs the risk of allowing all sorts of amusements, even tiddlywinks.

What we need are better lexicographers.

 

Self righteous much? Where's the Ziryab edition of the dictionary? Can't wait for that publication. I hate to break it to you but the meaning of words are kind of agreed by many and the Oxford Dictionary lexicographers are surely more qualified than some rando in a chess forum. LUL

 

 

Your asinine comment barely deserves a reply. But, as others also read this thread, ...

Please reread what I said about etymology and then read the Oxford dictionary entry: https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/187476

That's not the dictionary the dull plodders are citing.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, chess fit easily within the definition with sport.

I readily admit that one can find many dictionary definitions that are less accommodating because the lexicographers of those texts aim at reductionist definitions. The scholars who edit the OED are less facile.

 

This guy cannot read LOL It even states in OED that in "MODERN" usage - sport is defined as a physical exertion and skill. (PLEASE SEE #4 in his link) That is WHY so many "dull plodders" find on a quick search. Because.... HELLO we live in the now.... the last few hundred years. Anybody there old timer? ANYTHING could be counted as a sport if you go back far enough in its usage. The OED link he provides contains all recorded uses of sport throughout history duhhhh. Many which are obsolete or rare. Seems like Ziryab's reading comprehension is as antiquated as his usage of the term sport. (Use the scroll function buddy) My initial response was barely worthy of a reply from you? Yup... What a self righteous egomaniac.

 

 

Now, you've succeeded in summarizing my original post, albeit with twice the verbiage. 

It's hard to communicate with someone who doesn't understand the meaning of words..... You lost chump just leave

Avatar of hikarunaku

Avatar of Praxis_Streams

The International Olympic Committee recognizes chess as a "mind sport." 

 

That being said, if a professional chess player called him/herself a "sportsman" or "athlete" it would be incredibly misleading. No matter the rigid definitions that we can call upon, people generally have a schema for sports limited to those games that require more physical activity than what chess requires.

 

For example, if your friend asked you to go play a sport in the park with her this weekend, you probably would be surprised when you find out that your friend wants to play bridge with you. Bridge is also identified as a sport by the IOC, but it was still misleading for her to call it a "sport" so colloquially. 

 

I think a more interesting question is why some chess players so desperately want chess to be  recognized as a sport? 

Avatar of hikarunaku

Cos chess is a sport. Ben Finegold is like a NFL athlete, just more round. 

Avatar of Ziryab
lfPatriotGames wrote:

The people who think the definition of words include descriptions from 200 years ago aren't living in the present. Even the title of this topic should be a clue. "Is chess a sport" Not "was chess a sport". Maybe Ziryab doesn't understand that definitions of words change over time. Right now, there is no question, chess is not a sport. By definition.

 

Is this the third or fourth thread where we have had this argument? I've lost count.

What I can recall, however, is that you have offered two points:

1) Tirelessly repeating a mantra of what the dictionary says about common usage.

I've acknowledged that point.

 

2) Offering increasingly absurd comparisons reduce the nuances of language to some sort of mathematical formula, while in the same breath accusing me of not understanding language.

Despite many Herculean efforts, no one has succeeded in reducing language to math. I'm not gonna take the time to walk you through the history of these efforts. I need to get to the range where I can engage in another sport that often involves me sitting on my behind, but first I need to get some exercise before it is too hot to walk my dog.

We agree that chess is not athletics.

I do not agree that the word sport is wholly free of historic meanings (no word is), nor that dictionaries account for how many use the term sport.

I've offered arguments that you seem to think that you have refuted by repeating the point I acknowledge at the outset. You have not yet addressed the crux of my assertion. Probably because you do not comprehend the nuance and flexibility at the heart of  how "words change over time", nor how they change from context to context, nor ...

So, we are left with the trolls, like hikarunaku, posting images that miss the difference between sports and athletics; that is that accept tout court the mantra of the dull plodders.

Avatar of hikarunaku

Trolls like @Ziryab post mindless commentary over stupid topics. 

Avatar of Ziryab
hikarunaku wrote:

Trolls like @Ziryab post mindless commentary over stupid topics. 

 

Brilliant! Original! Sophisticated! Surprising deep and trenchant commentary!














Go away little boy.

At least the patriot gal acts like an adult, even if she lacks imagination.

Avatar of hikarunaku
Ziryab wrote:
hikarunaku wrote:

Trolls like @Ziryab post mindless commentary over stupid topics. 

 

Brilliant! Original! Sophisticated! Surprising deep and trenchant commentary!














Go away little boy.

At least the patriot gal acts like an adult, even if she lacks imagination.

You are the little one. I will take you and your dogs for a walk. 

Avatar of Ziryab
hikarunaku wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
hikarunaku wrote:

Trolls like @Ziryab post mindless commentary over stupid topics. 

 

Brilliant! Original! Sophisticated! Surprising deep and trenchant commentary!














Go away little boy.

At least the patriot gal acts like an adult, even if she lacks imagination.

You are the little one. I will take you and your dogs for a walk. 

 

Come along, then, child. See if you can keep up.

Avatar of hikarunaku
Ziryab wrote:
hikarunaku wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
hikarunaku wrote:

Trolls like @Ziryab post mindless commentary over stupid topics. 

 

Brilliant! Original! Sophisticated! Surprising deep and trenchant commentary!














Go away little boy.

At least the patriot gal acts like an adult, even if she lacks imagination.

You are the little one. I will take you and your dogs for a walk. 

 

Come along, then, child. See if you can keep up.

I will keep you on the leash or will you fetch a ball for me. I know dogs love it.