Now the truth!
Some Billionaire was bored playing with his model toys and decided to play a sick joke. He just made a working
and larger version of the model below for 100 Million. Does it look familiar? I bet it does now.
.
psychic chess masters
Sort:
May 27, 2013
0
#743
Note the Ankh in the drawing up two from here. This lends credence to the Stargate theory.
DrSpudnik wrote:
Note the Ankh in the drawing up two from here. This lends credence to the Stargate theory.
And this one Stargate Atlantis.
Ubik42 wrote:
I tried to catch up in this thread, but lost interest around where a longish quote from Barry Goldwater was offered as evidence for UFO's.
If someone doesnt get what evidence means...it makes discussions pretty pointless.
This.
Almost at #910 now and on our way to 1,000 !
May 27, 2013
0
#747
Here is a picture of the people who actually run the galaxy. Don't get on their bad side!!
DrSpudnik wrote:
Here is a picture of the peoplw who actually run the galaxy. Don't get on their bad side!!
Hey that is a picture of my family and i am not in it. 
pdela wrote:
Dark City, right?
Yeah. Not proud of them.
May 27, 2013
0
#751
Uh oh, someone got them mad.
[uh oh, I thought this thread was "off topic" lol]
Videos like those would have been quite convincing decades ago before the easy availibility of CGI. Does it strike anyone as odd that the UFO's chose this point in time to invade - just at the moment when anyone and his mother can create a decent looking fake?
On the other hand, if its on the internets, its got to be true. I heard it on the internets.
Now how do we know your the alien we have been looking for all the time.
Do not try any Jedi mind tricks either!
May 27, 2013
0
#754
Ubik42 wrote:
Videos like those would have been quite convincing decades ago before the easy availibility of CGI. Does it strike anyone as odd that the UFO's chose this point in time to invade - just at the moment when anyone and his mother can create a decent looking fake?
On the other hand, if its on the internets, its got to be true. I heard it on the internets.
It would probably help your understanding if you could imagine that UFOs have been seen for many decades, not just since the Internet.
Sure, but simply being unexplained or unidentified doesn't automatically make it aliens.
trysts wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:
Videos like those would have been quite convincing decades ago before the easy availibility of CGI. Does it strike anyone as odd that the UFO's chose this point in time to invade - just at the moment when anyone and his mother can create a decent looking fake?
On the other hand, if its on the internets, its got to be true. I heard it on the internets.
It would probably help your understanding if you could imagine that UFOs have been seen for many decades, not just since the Internet.
Yes I am aware of the history - I was a UFO "believer" back in the 70's.
May 27, 2013
0
#757
TheGrobe wrote:
Sure, but simply being unexplained or unidentified doesn't automatically make it aliens.
That's not news to anyone, TheGrobe. It's the details of specific sightings which allows one to propose an alien hypothesis.
May 27, 2013
0
#758
Ubik42 wrote:
trysts wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:
Videos like those would have been quite convincing decades ago before the easy availibility of CGI. Does it strike anyone as odd that the UFO's chose this point in time to invade - just at the moment when anyone and his mother can create a decent looking fake?
On the other hand, if its on the internets, its got to be true. I heard it on the internets.
It would probably help your understanding if you could imagine that UFOs have been seen for many decades, not just since the Internet.
Yes I am aware of the history - I was a UFO "believer" back in the 70's.
I don't know what a UFO believer is, but I also don't know why you would suggest that UFOs are a recent phenomenon if you knew about their existence before?
Call the EPA, FBI, CIA, UN, 4D, CHINA Mafia, crazy uncle they have gained loyalist sympathetic to their cause.
trysts wrote:
TheGrobe wrote:
Sure, but simply being unexplained or unidentified doesn't automatically make it aliens.
That's not news to anyone, TheGrobe. It's the details of specific sightings which allows one to propose an alien hypothesis.
An alien hypothesis is perfectly fine, but some go off the rails absent any good evidence. Easily faked videos don't constitute good evidence.
For example, if that "London" video a couple of pages back were real (I even doubt its London, much less London in January), we should have perhaps hundreds of videos all over the city from different angles.
That would be harder to fake.
But one video over a populated city just screams "fake".
Hey i just got an message from the aliens and they want to have first contact with the readers of this thread via me.
"Greeting Earthlings are you up for a game of Chess?