psychic chess masters

Sort:
Knightly_News

MASTER VALEK! 

You got so carried away by your flame war that you never even acknowledged the great and more topical post I made.  What do you folks think of this as it pertains to expanded possibilities that could help account for things like telepathy and extra-terrestrial UFOs?

=====

 In quantum physics there are is a sub-atomic particle that spins in the opposite direction of its counterpart whereever it is in time and space, apparently.  So if one particle is on 'the other side' of the universe from its counterpart and that law holds (and they believe it does), then how can spin information be relayed across such a vast distance instantaneously, given the limits of the speed of light?

And if it can, what does that say about the real limits?  And if information can travel instantaneously at vast distances like that, couldn't matter be rearranged accordingly to correspond - so a form of teleportation or transportation, if information replicates itself or transfers instantaneously across the universe?  I mean, for all we know governments or private institutions, scientists and/or militaries are doing stuff along these lines already.

With the current trends of science, along with our limits of knowledge, how could we possibly rule that out?

TheGrobe

Expansion is not the same thing as infinite.

Einstein famously quipped that only two things in the universe were infinite, hydrogen and stupidity -- and he wasn't sure about hydrogen.

Man, he was sure on point about that.

TheGrobe

I meant he was right about the stupidity.

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:
reflectivist wrote:

MASTER VALEK! 

You got so carried away by your flame war that you never even acknowledged the great and more topical post I made.  What do you folks think of this as it pertains to expanded possibilities that could help account for things like telepathy and extra-terrestrial UFOs?

=====

 In quantum physics there are is a sub-atomic particle that spins in the opposite direction of its counterpart whereever it is in time and space, apparently.  So if one particle is on 'the other side' of the universe from its counterpart and that law holds (and they believe it does), then how can spin information be relayed across such a vast distance instantaneously, given the limits of the speed of light?

And if it can, what does that say about the real limits?  And if information can travel instantaneously at vast distances like that, couldn't matter be rearranged accordingly to correspond - so a form of teleportation or transportation, if information replicates itself or transfers instantaneously across the universe?  I mean, for all we know governments or private institutions, scientists and/or militaries are doing stuff along these lines already.

With the current trends of science, along with our limits of knowledge, how could we possibly rule that out?

Spin is actually called, angular momentum in quantum physics. A particle which spins opposite to another particle, say on a distance of 10 billion years is actually called quantum entanglement, a very complicated subject. 

 

Information can be rearranged at large distances, you are right using this, but it doesn't transfer information faster than light. Information in physics under this means that everything is inherently non-local. 

Aha!  So you are not only a master, but a spin doctor as well!

Interesting.  Besides, the problem in my theory, is, how would one co-locate quantumly entangled particles to places of interest anyway? 

Unless there's something oddly and usefully circular about the scheme.

TheGrobe

Uh-huh.

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:

He had quite a few stupid comments himself, like thinking no one could harness energy from the atom even from his own equation E=Mc^2.

I think it would be wise of you, to actually learn physics before you try and preach it, or try the old card ''argument from authority'' on me.

Stupid?  Um, I lay no claim to expertise about physics.  I'm sure you're right. I don't know enough to know how stupid my speculation is.  I actually did software engineering reporting directly to a Ph.d. of Physics for a large computer hardware manf a long time ago and helped him get all his physics-oriented software in working order, and I could see the rolling of the eyes when I discussed things in that realm ... but whatever, this isn't that.  This is a forum on chess.com, not a place for you to puff up your ego at everyone's expense.  I was on your side here and actually discussing the subject with you until you decided to call me stupid.  Now I see how you keep getting yourself into trouble and alienate everyone.  

trysts

Haha! This is the marathon thread! Y'all have been going at it since I woke up this morningLaughing

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:

I don't believe you are stupid for one minute. 

Oh, believe it.  I have had many stupid minutes and will have many stupid more. But that's for me to know and you to find out :-)

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:

Reflect, i am posting again, to make sure you realize the comment you quoted was not about you, I like you, I think you are a sound guy :)

Yeah, I'm a real solid upstanding pillar of the community.  You got that right!  Solid as wavy gravy.

TheGrobe

It's OK. You only made a fool out of one person.

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:

:/ I really don't think you are stupid...

 

And here me guys who have posted here... I don't believe any of you are. You just need to back off and get there without the derogatory comments (Not directed at the OP). It was not my intention to make fools out of anyone tonight, but none or most of you did not have the same respect for me. Time to wake up. 

You are an odd guy.  You actually have some good information, but you are the last one who should be told that because you have a real blindspot in your social interactions, and tend to be egotistical, which alienates people, and then you become overly sensitive and it becomes a viscious cycle.   Nobody likes a show off or a know-it-all, even if they are the real McCoy in many ways.  And some question that, and you'll get a lot more doubt thrown your way if you get so egotistical and obstinate.  And then it becomes a pile on.  But I don't find you vindictive or petty beyond that, and some of your stuff is really good information, at least from my point of view, so I try to take the good stuff and disregard the rest.  Some are out for your blood, but you have provoked a lot of that as well IMO, so you need to chill too.

Conquistador

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:

You brought it on yourself, your lack of knowledge is not my downfall, and never was. What was your downfall is pretending to know something more than me about something, but doing so with the highest impunity, I mean.... If you won't admit it, I won't feel sorry in the slightest. 

BS.  For one thing, I just credited you for your strengths and was self-deprecating about my own in some areas.  I'm not the obstinate one on the ego trip here, you are.  Are you really just a troll?  I keep trying to give you more credit than that, but if you keep being an offensive egomaniac and a know-it-all and alienating everyone, I guess the only explanation is that you are trolling.  You seem to have perspective on everyone and everything but yourself and your social liabilities that have nothing to do with how knowledgeable you are.

kco

Would this slo-mo train wreck gonna come to an end soon ?

Knightly_News
kco wrote:

Would this slo-mo train wreck gonna come to an end soon ?

No one is keeping you here.  Seems like you like to throw gasoline on fires and run away like some kind of forum terror.

kco
reflectivist wrote:
kco wrote:

Would this slo-mo train wreck gonna come to an end soon ?

No one is keeping you here.  Seems like you like to throw gasoline on fires and run away like some kind of forum terror.

Laughing

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:

no way... you are cherry picking everything now. It wasn't long ago you were in collusion with me on the idea of this supernatural shit. Now you are B-Sing me, becaue of what? I made no comments about you personally, I certainly never qouted you, but for some reason you have the hump?

 Take me off your friend list, if you are going to be unfriendly. You've only got a slice of the pizza thinking you know it all as well. 

Oh brother.  This is absurd.  My advocacy or dismissal of an idea isn't based on whether we are good buddies, I'm interested in learning the truth, and I think honesty is the way to go there.   You seem to have zero ability to be introspective or find any truth or wisdom in anything I say, so I'm done.  I said my piece.  I didn't do it to hurt your feelings.  I thought you being the intelligent person you are could really consider what I was saying and accept any of it that applied, but apparently you can't.

sapientdust
Master_Valek wrote:

You've only got a slice of the pizza thinking you know it all as well. 

Could be a large slice of pizza though:

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:

Please, you are not interested in learning shit, if you had, you would realize I would be telling the truth about everything I have said tonight. Just like any good person willing to know the truth doesn't take a lot for someone to check out the stuff I have said. Nothing which I have said in your pathetic thread has been a lie... so block me and do me a favour so I don't waste a moment more on you, or the pathetic bunch of trolls invading it. You're on you're own now.

Oh, OK.  Well, I never said you were lying, or wrong on the facts.  Nor did I vet everything you posted on the off chance that not everything you say is the word of God.  No, the purpose and target of my posts about your behavior, was entirely different and not to offend you or hurt your feelings.  I really thought maybe you had some ability to be introspective and look at yourself as others do, from the social perspective.  I can. I'm not expecting anything of you I wouldn't from myself.  No double standard there.

For example, I am profoundly aware of my social liabilities and do what I can to offset them within my means, or at least accept the repercussions when I go too far.  I would never be deeply offended for someone plainly, honestly, and with good will pointing out something about me if I could see it was true, or even had a substantial element of truth in it, even if it wasn't a flattering quality that was being discussed.

But you've gone from one extreme of believing you're my ally to never speaking with me again over this, and implying that I'm calling you a liar now, when I never did.  So, OK.  Have the last word.  I'm done on this subject for now.  (Notice I'm not giving you any dramatic ultimatums).

kco

Why wait for him to block you when you can just go ? You are only keeping his thread alive.