I play it as my primary defense against 1. e4, because I feel comfortable playing in structures where I don’t necessarily have the space advantage, but I do have a solid position, and I can prepare at least a couple pawn breaks (b5 or c5 in typical Caro structures, e5 or a minority attack in the reversed Carlsbad). I usually don’t play attacks myself, but occasionally I play against somebody who decides to be very aggressive in the opening, and I’ve found that I have an easy time defending against those attacks, and then I usually can launch a successful counterattack, using all the weak squares that my opponent leaves behind
Is the Caro-kann really worth playing?
I play it as my primary defense against 1. e4, because I feel comfortable playing in structures where I don’t necessarily have the space advantage, but I do have a solid position, and I can prepare at least a couple pawn breaks (b5 or c5 in typical Caro structures, e5 or a minority attack in the reversed Carlsbad). I usually don’t play attacks myself, but occasionally I play against somebody who decides to be very aggressive in the opening, and I’ve found that I have an easy time defending against those attacks, and then I usually can launch a successful counterattack, using all the weak squares that my opponent leaves behind
https://www.chess.com/openings/Caro-Kann-Defense
Maybe have some lessons on it and check out the opening and see if it suits your style of play.
I've been taking a look into the caro-kann, I mean the postions you get don't seem to ever be very good, unless your opponnet just has no idea how to play and makes a huge mistake, maybe it's just my preferences but I couldn't get into those postions if I had a choice
I mean looking at it, +1 almost for white with best moves played by white, scandinavian +1, I know it has some problems but it also immeditaly challenges the middle compared to the caro-kann
Really I just want to ask any players who play this, why they play it, and how easy it is for them to overcome the computer analysis of +1 advantage for white
Where is this +1 eval that you're seeing, in the Caro-Kann?
If white has a +1 score in the opening, then black must've played incorrectly along the way ... That would be a mistake of the player, not a fault of the Caro-Kann.
Firouzja (the current world #2) plays the Caro-Kann as one of his main e4 defenses. So it must be pretty solid, if he trusts it at the top level.
What I like about the CK is that black can play slow and positional, or loose and tactical ... there are different options for different kinds of players. It's not always the "boring" defense that a lot of players think it is.
GothamChess on Caro-Kann...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebfzL_GwiIE&list=PLBRObSmbZluTpMdP-rUL3bQ5GA8v4dMbT&index=35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmbU97iftC8&list=PLBRObSmbZluTpMdP-rUL3bQ5GA8v4dMbT
Hanging Pawns on Caro-Kann...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jiz7KLKjLas&list=PLssNbVBYrGcBZfLbeAU7d8llHf2jxBEl7
First Forum Post
No but I've been taking a look into the caro-kann, I mean the postions you get don't seem to ever be very good, unless your opponnet just has no idea how to play and makes a huge mistake, maybe it's just my preferences but I couldn't get into those postions if I had a choice
I mean looking at it, +1 almost for white with best moves played by white, scandinavian +1, I know it has some problems but it also immeditaly challenges the middle compared to the caro-kann
Really I just want to ask any players who play this, why they play it, and how easy it is for them to overcome the computer analysis of +1 advantage for white
and how does your attack usually go in the caro-kann?