Is the chess.com rating accurate ?

Music to my ears. You sure that also applies to folks like me in the sub-1800 range?

yes,maybe

This is the lastest survey afaik.

I have the opposite idea from yours. How can you tell if a score is accurate or not?
From the actual number of games that with the variance tends to make the score more truthful.

If you play 50 games a year (example) online and you play 500 games a year online, it is more likely that the online score reflects more the real value of your game.

Meh, I’m 2119 bullet, 2000+ blitz with a USCF peak of 1919...

I'm 1300 FIDE, 1750 chess.com blitz, 1800 lichess blitz.

That graph doesn't apply to everyone I guess.

Now I got the big head, because according to your chart, chess.com, and Wikipedia, I am a class "A" player. First time I ever made an "A" in my life !!

Dose this meen I has to spell corractly in my mesages?

The Chess.com ratings map pretty closely to USCF and FIDE ratings overall. You can use it generally as a quick mapping to your USCF rating. USCF ratings start at 100 and the Chess.com equivalent is a bit under 500. The gap shrinks up until the breakeven range of 1600-1650. Chess.com ratings become slightly higher again as one’s rating increases. FIDE ratings follow a similar distribution to the USCF ratings. In the past, we have seen Chess.com ratings more similar to OTB ratings, and due to fewer OTB events in 2020-2021, Chess.com ratings may be drifting a bit higher. We also expect some changes in OTB ratings when the number of events picks back up in the future.

Typical bullet ratings on Chess.com are slightly lower than blitz ratings. The recent +150 increase that Chess.com employed helped bring these ratings closer together. Rapid ratings start higher than blitz ratings with a breakeven point around 1650 when blitz ratings begin to be higher. 

I find quite a few NMs who are 1700-1900 at both blitz and rapid, but there are plenty much higher, too.