https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/89753431347?tab=review&move=120
Is this disrespectful ? Idc anyway
Sort:
TheNameofNames wrote:
its not disrespectful you need at least four queens to mate properly
fr
Sep 29, 2023
0
#3
You know there's a resign button, don't you?
Are you hoping for a stalemate? Well, at your level your opponent's promoting to a gazillion queens actually improves your chances.
I think it’s kinda funny not disrespectful
Sep 29, 2023
0
#7
Both of u are idiots,settle a draw even I have come back from that kind of situation it sucks when ur in the lead like that and then get beat by a single king although I’ve never played that many queens against one king! Settle a DRAW!!
LawrencePS wrote:
There is always a resign button
He was hoping for a stalemate
Sep 30, 2023
0
#10
It's unnecessary and dumb, and at 800's stalemate wouldnt be a surprise. but if the other player feels disrespected he can resign
It is not only disrespectful, but also not allowed
I’ve checkmated with six or seven bishops on the board...I think I may have done it with five knights as well...
I very occasionally sub promote to bishop and knight to practice that checkmate after maybe giving a rook or queen away on purpose...
you could get play-banned
Sep 30, 2023
0
#14
huh would you? as long as you are not stalling (waiting for a long time before you move) it's probably ok
wouldn't it be counted as stalling?
SriyogeshS wrote:
wouldn't it be counted as stalling?
If I recall correctly from moderators comments, yes this is a form of stalling which is reportable.
With very low rated players, I doubt it would be seen as stalling. Little understanding of the game. Often clueless on how to make simple mates. Prone to extensive repetitive checking, and needless eating of every piece, along with over promotion. Very typical actions, which probably wouldn't get reported to begin with.
Its only inconsistent!!
