It's over,I lost 44 Rapid points

That is really not a lot. Don't worry.

That happens to everyone.

Many people get upset over losing 200 or more points in a day.

Don't worry . I had a rating of over 1300 at 5 min + 5 s , and when I started playing at 3 min + 2 s , my rating decrease a little over 1000 , but at 15 min + 10 s my rating was 1700 ( medium second category )

Well, boo-hoo.

I lost 400 Daily rating points.

My max was losing about 180 in a day (minute a 24/h tournament ) I ended at like 2020 or smth

2751 + 400 = 3151 . Did you get a rating higher than Komodo 3 64-bit engine ?

You are the great grandmaster .. xo xo xo

It is

I've been on a losing streak and lost around 250 rapid points in the last few weeks but I've been playing after drinking alcohol which is not a good idea and am under stress so not fully focussed. Being intoxicated makes me more reckless and less able to manage the clock but it's more frustrating losing a game and then starting a new game as black several times in a row.

That is because they want you black, they are controlling you, and they put time pressure on you to break you. You should either drink more and play less or play more and drink less.

Play some system openings as black

I don't know system openings as black

Well, I cannot win a single game since yesterday's morning update. Is that a coincidence? Currently on a 15-20 games losing streak. Rapid, blitz, bullet, tried them all, lost them all, totally outmatched. Even if I was tired yesterday, today I am not. Like what's happening? Are we being matched against bots that received an update? How do you explain this. Lol

The FIDE rating is more realistic than the Chess.com rating , because the Sonneborn-Berger system or the Swiss system is a more realistic rating than the rating that results from a game of a lower rating with a lower rating that does not enter the competition of a higher rating , for example, the first who is in the competition with a lower rating could beat someone with a higher rating, which would in that way reduce their rating more when they lose to a lower rating, until the lower rating would increase more with a higher rating would win , while when players of approximately the same rating play then the rating increase or decrease a little , although the first one of them can be stronger than several of them with a higher rating . So often players with a higher rating leave the game when they see that they have to play with a player with a lower rating, because if by chance they lose, they lose a lot of points, so the rating Chess. coma is not real , It so often happens that a rating of 900 comes among the rights in competition with a rating of 2000 or more

but i had improved way more then plunged

Neither the Swiss system nor the Sonneborne-Berger system has ANYTHING to do with ratings.

They are NOT rating systems. The Sonneborne-Berger system is a point-count tie-break system for determining which player gets the title whenever two or more players finish the tournament (not the game, the TOURNAMENT) with the same total score... ie: both having scored 7.5 points out of 10. It has nothing whatsoever to do with ratings, and has no effect on ratings.

The Swiss system is a method for determining which player you should play next in a tournament. Again, it has nothing whatsoever to do with ratings, and has no effect on ratings.

Do you just make this stuff up?