Fischer vs. Houdini, WHO WOULD WIN??

Sort:
digimon1

Fischer would refuse to play ;)

Ziryab
IMDeviate wrote:
NimzoRoy wrote:

Actually we don't "all know that Fischer was the greatest player of all times." Try speaking for yourself occasionally. Karpov and Kasparov had much longer careers, higher peak ratings and neither one seemed to have had a debilitating mental illness that prevented them from playing after they became the world champion. 


I believe the OP said Fischer was the greatest player of all time and I tend to agree. We weren't talking about length of career or peak rating (don't forget ratings from one era to the next don't lend themselves to precise comparisons).

If you consider Fischer's rise, the environment where he grew up (USA vs Eastern Bloc), the quality of his games and results vs legendary players of that era - Earth has never seen a chess player quite like Fischer.

Never fails though whenever Fischer's name pops up in the forums that the anti-Fischer trolls are not far behind. Of course Fischer was screwed up in the head. Anybody consider the possibilities that Fischer's mental illness was part of what helped him get so good at chess?


You've not heard of Pillsbury? He was better than Fischer.

Sorrowstealer

seeing the thread's name I thought Fishcher some new engine's name

ButWhereIsTheHorse

Fischer manages to blow up the chess machine using his sheer will to win

heinzie

So far Fischer has the public vote!

Hurt Houdini

Heal Fischer

PrawnEatsPrawn
heinzie wrote:

So far Fischer has the public vote!

Hurt Houdini

Heal Fischer


 

Ignore this rabble-rouser, for the sake of your own sanity.

heinzie

Isn't it wonderful that you can just drop a few general buzz words and in an instant us chess forum people are all very worried and before you know it the insults are flying around :)

Ziryab
Carbon life forms have no chance against Houdini. Be careful what you claim concerning Fischer's prowess: rumors circulated that he was not from this world.
PrawnEatsPrawn
heinzie wrote:

Isn't it wonderful that you can just drop a few general buzz words and in an instant us chess forum people are all very worried and before you know it the insults are flying around :)


 

I aim to please.

PrawnEatsPrawn
Ziryab wrote:
Carbon life forms have no chance against Houdini. Be careful what you claim concerning Fischer's prowess: rumors circulated that he was not from this world.

 

In another ten thousand years, they'll be calling Fischer "Pete".

 

 

(Peat Wink)

Sidford_Knight

I'd give Fischer the pyschological edge.

theoreticalboy

Woah, people are answering this topic seriously?  Is that comedy, or tragedy?

Sidford_Knight
theoreticalboy wrote:

Woah, people are answering this topic seriously?  Is that comedy, or tragedy?


I think Fischer could pysche out a machine so I'm either serious or seriously deluded.

heinzie
theoreticalboy wrote:

Woah, people are answering this topic seriously?  Is that comedy, or tragedy?


It's following the general Internet-forum rule that nobody reads whatever actually is posted, they just pick up a few words from the last page and start their yelling based on a few key points

SimonSeirup

Well, I would'nt call Bobby Fischer as the best player of all time, as a fact. And of course Houdini would win.

theoreticalboy

I belief white can does en passant.

AndyClifton
theoreticalboy wrote:

Woah, people are answering this topic seriously?  Is that comedy, or tragedy?


Just another chess.com reality show.

heinzie
AndyClifton wrote:

Just another chess.com reality show.


Wow, nice!! When can we see this Houdini documentary on chess.com TV?

1pawndown
digimon1 wrote:

Fischer would refuse to play ;)


 I think this is the definitive answer. (Bobby's most frequent move.)

jason17

I think that Fischer looks better in a jacket than houdini does, but houdini has a definitive edge when it comes to who looks better with their shirt off.

Now when it comes to cooking, I think that Kasparov would be tastier to eat than a bishop, but not if he dressed like a knight.