Thank you for the feedback devoid. :)
Kasparov vs. Karpov: Nimzo-Indian Defense VIDEO

I like the level of analysis as is. The average player on chess.com (and elsewhere on the web I presume) is about 1200. I've seen tons of videos aimed at higher rated players and they seem to be largely a long list of variations analyzed from the given position. They don't really offer anything conceptual usually, and are kinda boring. Maybe fine if you like to memorize different lines, but I don't think that appeals to the majority of players. There is a reason ChessNetwork videos are so popular. They are somewhat unique in explaining the 'why' of positional play. My vote: don't change it.
This video analyzes the Round 11 game of the World Chess Championship of 1985 between Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparov. Just when the position becomes very quiet, a very surprising blunder occurs.
http://blog.chess.com/ChessNetwork/kasparov-vs-karpov-nimzo-indian-defense-video
Comments are appreciated!