Kings Gambit. Accept or Decline?

Sort:
Avatar of jnicholes

What do you prefer when the opening is a Kings Gambit? Accepting or Declining? I like to Decline with a Classical Defense when I play black.

What do you guys prefer and why? I am curious.

Jared

Avatar of m_connors
jnicholes wrote:

 

What do you prefer when the opening is a Kings Gambit? Accepting or Declining? I like to Decline with a Classical Defense when I play black.

What do you guys prefer and why? I am curious.

Jared

Never play it. But if I did, no thank-you, decline . . .

Avatar of Lagomorph

I was always taught to accept a gambit.

 

 

Avatar of batgirl

I've never not accepted it.

Avatar of kindaspongey

How about compromise?

 

Avatar of batgirl
BiteThePawn wrote:
batgirl wrote:

I've never not accepted it.

 

You accepted this win, LOL

 

As I said . . And, btw. I offered the gambit.

Avatar of n8boy
I never accept because I assume they know the opening well.
Avatar of pfren

Both are fine for Black.

Avatar of Pawngrabber8006

Falkbeer Counter-Gambit 

Avatar of batgirl
CoffeeAnd420 wrote:

Someone open's king's gambit and I just resign. Terrible positions. 

Chess is about the playing (for most of us amateurs, at least).  I don't really care what my opponent plays; I'll pick up the gauntlet. 

Avatar of glamdring27

I play it as White whenever my opponent plays e5 and hate it when they decline.  I've never seen anyone play the variation shown above though with d5 followed by ef.  Almost every player I play who plays d5 follows it by e4.

I find it pretty boring when black declines though.  I lose plenty when they accept but I win plenty too and they're usually exciting games, albeit often with unsound sacrifices and play that a strong player could refute like swatting a fly away.  Occasionally it still gets wild when they decline though.

For example, the computer analysis rated me at 49% accuracy in this one, but it was fun since my opponent just crumbled in the face of an unsound attack!

 


Apparently I have 220 King's Gambit games in my game history.  Fewer than I might have thought, but then if my opponent doesn't play e5 I can't play it!

Avatar of french

I prefer to decline. When you accept, you surrender your share of the center for a pawn you cannot hold on to. 

Avatar of kindaspongey
glamdring27 wrote:

I play it as White whenever my opponent plays e5 and hate it when they decline.  I've never seen anyone play the variation shown above though with d5 followed by ef. ...

GM Larry Kaufman suggested the variation in his 2012 book. I do not think that he is the only one.

Avatar of staples13

Accept

Avatar of jnicholes

For some reason, I didnt receive a notification of all these responses. I just saw all the posts.

So many responses and so many opinions! I like reading what people have to say.

A lot of great input so far! Thanks!

Avatar of jnicholes
 
One of my Kings Gambit Games.

 

Avatar of Caesar49bc

Years ago, people thought chess engines busted the King's Gambit Accepted. I wonder if that's still true. This was around 2007 or 2008.

Avatar of chessman6500

I like to decline, because usually when I accept my position falters. 

Avatar of nighteyes1234
kindaspongey wrote:

How about compromise?

 

 

I think black alluded to what he thought of it by resigning.

 

Avatar of kindaspongey