i favour 2bishops over2knights, but 1knight over 1bishop
Knights or bishop?

Most times if you got 2 bishops 1 is weak and the other is strong but if you get to a end game with both B then you are in good shape

Depends hugely on the position. Generally, bishops are better in open positions compared with the Knight, which is normally better in closed. There's pros and cons to both. 😃

Depends hugely on the position. Generally, bishops are better in open positions compared with the Knight, which is normally better in closed. There's pros and cons to both. 😃
Bishops are also better in positions with unbalanced Pawns on both wings (eg: 4 vs 3 on the K-side and 2 vs 3 on the Q-side) because the long-range Bishop can help to defend one wing while assisting the advance on the other wing. A Knight would have to choose which job to do.

As a general rule in middle game, a kt post in 5th and 6th ranks in the centre "c" to "f" files are always better than Bishop.

My "Kids, don't try this at home!" game is a convincing example of the power of the Two Bishops on the attack... also known as the Killer B's !

Bishops cover more ground.
Bishops actually cover less ground. A knight can potentially occupy or attack every square on the board, a bishop exactly half that.

I'm just giving general advice for patzers who can't decide. In open positions, bishops are probably better and in closed positions, knights are better. Generally, bishops are better by a tiny bit.

I'm just giving general advice for patzers who can't decide. In open positions, bishops are probably better and in closed positions, knights are better. Generally, bishops are better by a tiny bit.
Sometimes. For me knights are better by a tiny bit because of how I like to play. It really just depends on the opponent, and how he or she plays. I usually find more opportunities with knights than I do bishops.

I'm just giving general advice for patzers who can't decide. In open positions, bishops are probably better and in closed positions, knights are better. Generally, bishops are better by a tiny bit.
Sometimes. For me knights are better by a tiny bit because of how I like to play. It really just depends on the opponent, and how he or she plays. I usually find more opportunities with knights than I do bishops.
Knights fork, bishops pin and cut.

But what if a bishop wants to "identify" as a knight or vice versa?
Then I sacrifice them or resign out of shame
I'm leaning knights, because they can use both color squares and fork and fortress each other . But there awkward and easy to kick around. What do you guys think?