Life of a Transexual Chess Player Pt. II: Competition

Sort:
Rosenbalm

I am actually considered a Fascist by most westerners because of my views on multiculturalism and belief in a corporate State, so I am presently surprised to see you bring up the Frankfurt theory. I am well aware of the Frankfurt school and the semetic force behind the bolshevising of the west. What surprises me is that an Afghan would be aware of this and even promote the worldview considering that immigration from Muslim countries is one of the things people like me fight against.

I see transgendered people as more of curisioity than anything. Just one of the many things that spring from bourgious decandence, and are really just a side effect of a greater issue. I won't get into the issue here because it's not the time or place. But suffice to say that I try not to be a jerk about things because all you're going to do is push people further away from your line of thinking (as if it were possible in my case).

MoMeetsAisha

LOL - yes I should change my flag.  I am British not Afghan.  

I carried out a social experiment by pretending to by an ISIS supporter and speaking to Muslim players.  I was going to do an blog article based on screenshots: more than 70% of the time, Musli.ms are sympathetic to ISIS.  Some even wanted to contact me offline about it.  Many on these forums believe the time is ripe for Isla.m to defeat the West.  I am serious! I study the Qur'an, Hadith and Sira - so i can hold a conversation with them.  I pretend I am a British convert.

My hypothesis is that 'moderate Isla.m' is an affectation of Westerners and bears not semblance to doctrinal reality, or even the mindset of the vast majority of the Musl.im world.

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan:"These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.”  Source: Milliyet, Turkey, August 21, 2007

(PS - MoMeetsAisha is in reference to Muhammad meeting Aisha... the 6 year old girl he married, his favourite 'wife')

If you want to know what else I think on the matter check out my blog.  I don't want to post links here or the PC-Thoughtcrime-Police might sanction me...

"Transgenderism... spring from bourgious decandence, and are really just a side effect of a greater issue."

I wrote about this on my blog in the link directly above.  According to Camille Paglia:

"I was always drawn to late or decadent phases of culture. Oscar Wilde is one of the great exponents of that in the late 19th century. He’s one of my strongest influences from my earliest years. And I found in my study that history is cyclic, and everywhere in the world you find this pattern in ancient times: that as a culture begins to decline, you have an efflorescence of transgender phenomena.That is a symptom of cultural collapse. "

No - you are not a 'fascist'.  This is simply another label that has been hijacked by the political Left - as a tool of censorship and marginalisation.

"I dont agree with open borders and mass-uncontrolled-unvetted-immigration (AKA invasion)" = XENOPHOBE!

"I think multiculturalism needs a rethink because Western white nations are losing their identity and are sitting on a demographic timebomb" = RACIST!

"There are basic fundamental differences between men and women and we should embrace them in the spirit of equality, not try to demasculinate men and defiminse women." = SEXIST!

"Islam is patently not a religion of peace, just read the fking Qur'an, just read the papers" = ISLAMOPHOBE!

"Mass migration is a deliberate plot by Globalists to implode the west for profit and to consolidate power." = CONSPIRACY THEORIST!

Etc etc etc

Its basically the use of labels so that they feel 'morally superior', and they do not have to listen to facts, logic or alternative views: they simply scream that you are a 'hater' and therefore you must be a FASCIST / NAZI.

Meanwhile the Left use every Fascist tactic of censorship, silencing, character assasination, media control, stigmatisation - and even violence - yet see no irony in this whatsoever: "THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS".

Good talking to you, would love to see you on my blog.

DrSpudnik

"They developed “Critical Theory” as a tool to undermine society via Academia, which in theory would seep into politics, pop culture and accepted thinking.  Therefore, infiltrating the Universities was (and still is) the key part of the “Long March” [#12] – for as Lenin said: “Give me just one generation of youth, and I will change the world.”"

I'm not going to quote the rest of this gibberish, but Lenin had at least three generations and after 70 years, the USSR fell to pieces and there was much rejoicing. Pictures of the Czar came out from nowhere and the churches reopened and were filled immediatly. 

MoMeetsAisha

"I'm not going to quote the rest of this gibberish, but Lenin had at least three generations and after 70 years, the USSR fell to pieces and there was much rejoicing. Pictures of the Czar came out from nowhere and the churches reopened and were filled immediatly."

I am quoting what the Frankfurters actually believed when they developed Cultural Marxism as an evolution of 'traditional marxism'.  They aimed to stratify society horizontally by race/gender/se.xual preference/religion.  Traditional communism stratified society vertically with the rich vs poor.  The Cultural Marxists saw that this was ineffective longterm because of the hold of religion in Western nations. It worked in the USSR, but only for a period, as you say - it eventually imploded.

The cultural Marxists think that this approach was wrong, first they have to infiltrate and destroy a society from WITHIN.

You might think this is gibberish, but i am only quoting and eplaining what THESE PEOPLE thought.  Whether you or I beleve it or not is irrelvent. You clearly have very liited understanding and knowledge of the subject.  Learn first, then maybe - just maybe - you can hold an intelligent conversation with me. 

Rosenbalm

Wow - it's great to meet a fellow far-right crusader on chess.com. I will definitely check out your blog. As an American it pains me a lot to see what is transpiring in Europe because I embrace my anglo roots and view England and EUrope in general as very important and dear to my heart. I root for UKIP - though I prefered the British National Front. In any case, we should probably cease the conversation for now so as not to invoke the wrath of the thought police.

MoMeetsAisha

Far-right - i guess :-) - but i don't believe in the Left-Right paradigm. It was created by Leftists academics so they can shove anything they don't like on the 'right', and so they can 'warn' that anyhing that is right of centre is on a slippery slope leading to Hitler.

(Conveinienty ignoring / rewriting history that Hitler was in fact a Socialist)

https://redgreenalliance.com/2016/02/12/the-left-right-paradigm-and-the-new-world-order/

As for UK politics - its a tough one. UKIP are a bit too wishy washy. BNP had policies that were too Statist and too many complete bigots.

The problem throughout the world is that if your politics are left, centre left, centre - there are tons of options.  If you are anti-mass-uncontrolled immigration, anti-Globalist, anti-PC etc - there is very little option.

The media control and lack of political options, is pushing people towards genuinely racist parties - as the only outlet for their political concerns.

Yes would like to talk to you on my site.  Sad that we both know the score and that we risk being banned from Chess.com for having a conversation...

All the best

DrSpudnik
MoMeetsAisha wrote:
...

You might think this is gibberish, but i am only quoting and eplaining what THESE PEOPLE thought.  Whether you or I beleve it or not is irrelvent. You clearly have very liited understanding and knowledge of the subject.  Learn first, then maybe - just maybe - you can hold an intelligent conversation with me. 

I don't want to have a conversation with any condescending troll on chess.com's forums. Your main premise (or whoever's it is, since you claim it and then put it on old Frankfurt School folks) is bogus. People aren't just blank-headed idiots (aside from you, of course, since you alone see true reality and know everything). Society and people cannot just be manipulated by outside agents of control. 

You're obviously just trolling everyone on the site and trying to goad people into arguing.

kco

MoMeetsAisha bored again Johnny.

molo1

buttmunch1337 wrote:

molo1 wrote:

being a trans means you have both body parts...a eunuch...

This demonstrates a lack of understanding of transsexuals, eunuchs, and hermaphrodites. I'm impressed that you managed to screw up three times in one post.

what does it mean then

bunicula

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transsexual

DrSpudnik

So is the Rocky Horror Picture Show a documentary?

Rosenbalm
DrSpudnik wrote:
MoMeetsAisha wrote:
...

You might think this is gibberish, but i am only quoting and eplaining what THESE PEOPLE thought.  Whether you or I beleve it or not is irrelvent. You clearly have very liited understanding and knowledge of the subject.  Learn first, then maybe - just maybe - you can hold an intelligent conversation with me. 

I don't want to have a conversation with any condescending troll on chess.com's forums. Your main premise (or whoever's it is, since you claim it and then put it on old Frankfurt School folks) is bogus. People aren't just blank-headed idiots (aside from you, of course, since you alone see true reality and know everything). Society and people cannot just be manipulated by outside agents of control

You're obviously just trolling everyone on the site and trying to goad people into arguing.

Wow.

Okay, first of all, it's not outside agents. It's inside agents. But even so - wow. What a thing to say. You go on about how Mo is being stupid and then say something like that. It brings to mind the scene in Godfather where Michael says, "Oh. Now who's being naive, Kay?".

Regardless of a person's beliefs or political leanings, one should take one look at that statement and laugh at it. There are many refutations. Here's a good one: religion. An inside agent of control that is very good at manipulating people. I consider myself a Christian, though I don't go to church and see the harm in organized religion. Religion is just one example.

Political correctness and liberalism - this overly egalitarian clinging to what is tantamount to "equality on sterorids"...it's very much a religion. One good example is why people still deny race and racial differences - in spite of the evidence. It's been said that it's easier to argue against facts than against faith, and this is very true. I mean, every species of animal on Earth is composed of sub-species and seperate groups. But humans - yea, we're the only exception to that. I feel you. Not.

Belief in inherent equality is a disease of the brain. The cold, hard natural world is a loud refutation of the idea of equality and a ringing endorsement of fundamental inequality. This inequality is the rule of things. Humans are not special. We die like animals and we are not equal. There is strong and weak, winner and loser, living and dead. None of these are equal. And the natural world don't care about your feelings.

MoMeetsAisha
DrSpudnik wrote:

I don't want to have a conversation with any condescending troll on chess.com's forums. Your main premise (or whoever's it is, since you claim it and then put it on old Frankfurt School folks) is bogus. People aren't just blank-headed idiots (aside from you, of course, since you alone see true reality and know everything). Society and people cannot just be manipulated by outside agents of control. 

You're obviously just trolling everyone on the site and trying to goad people into arguing.

LOL - you sound just like a Social Justice Warrior. Have I 'triggered' you in your chess.com 'safe space'...? Tongue Out

Let's break this down (*sighs*)

"I don't want a conversation" - the answer of every Leftist who finds an opinion they disagree with. Usually said right before making a statement that they do not want to hear a reply to...

"Condescending troll" - when presented with new and challenging info, Leftists automaticallly use labels as 'ad hominem' attacks.  You don't agree with me = therefore I am a troll. 

"Your main premise is bogus" - stating something is bogus is not an argument.  It is a statement of disagreement with nothing to back it up.

"[...] then put it on old Frankfurt School folks" - not even sure what you mean.  I have actually read their theories, studied them, written a thesis on them, debated them, and I am providing direct quotations and a link to a site with 18+ links. They did exist you know!

"[...] since you alone see true reality and know everything" and "You are trying to goad people into arguing"- this is a straw man. You are ascribing characteristics and opinions to me that you could not possibly know, unless you are psychic, and then attacking that straw man. This is another form of logical fallacy.  For what its worth I am very open minded and open to changing my opinion, as I have in the past, when I was fully paid-up Leftist, head of a Students Union of an entire region covering 11 Universities, organising protests, I even went to Africa to help the poor. Thankfully I woke up to the real agenda of the Progressive Left.

But hey, that's my personal opinion.  You don't like it, so instead of calm debate, you throw a hissy fit and call me 'condescending', 'troll', 'bogus', 'gibberish'... and note that I have not stooped to your level. Why? because I understand that resorting to cheap attacks, ad hominems, straw man arguments and slurs... is simply a sign that you have nothing of value to contribute, and so resort to base-level tactics.

Have a good day, sir! Wink

Progressant
Play more chess and spout less crap
MoMeetsAisha
Progressant wrote:
Play more chess and spout less crap

Yes... because that's the purpose of forums, isn't it? Cool

fiddletim
Rosenbalm wrote:

Wow - it's great to meet a fellow far-right crusader on chess.com. I will definitely check out your blog. As an American it pains me a lot to see what is transpiring in Europe because I embrace my anglo roots and view England and EUrope in general as very important and dear to my heart. I root for UKIP - though I prefered the British National Front. In any case, we should probably cease the conversation for now so as not to invoke the wrath of the thought police.

yes, a good place to start from is to appreciate the cultural enviroment from which one come from, but it seems like at this point in human history that would make for a very limited viewpoint. "thought police" ? do you feel persecuted ?

ThrillerFan

If both players are transgender, does trapping the Queen win the game?  I can imagine there being far more draws, and also kind of wierd that Queens could never oppose each other as if you attack their queen with your queen, you just put yourself in "check"!

MoMeetsAisha
ThrillerFan wrote:

If both players are transgender, does trapping the Queen win the game? 

Maybe, maybe... but I would bet money its going to involve more than one bishop being spanked

MoMeetsAisha

"Simon Williams plays some opening just messing around in blitz that he calls the Transvestite."

LOL - he better not say that too publically.  'Transphobia' is a new Social Justic Warrior cause, it is being pushed as a new 'hate crime', and (not kidding you) - people are getting CRIMINAL RECORDS for sending out 'hateful' Tweets.... like... like telling someone there are only two genders is now considered 'hateful'.

Rosenbalm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksajP0hOggY