I think I've seen ~ 900 - not sure
Lowest rating
Sort:
I forget. My tactics trainer rating was down to 600-700 at one point.
i'm not too sure.. but i've never dropped below the standard 1200 i think..
Sep 21, 2010
0
#5
wormrose wrote:
I think I've seen ~ 900 - not sure
OH! I misunderstood the question. 
MY lowest = 1082 (28 Jun 2008) 
currently 1727 One of the reasons I don't play here anymore is the wild fluctuations in my rating due to the RD. So I play where they use Elo.
yeres30 wrote:
At this time (September 21, 2010, 8:09 p.m Hawaii time) the lowest rating in this website is 320 on 3 wins, 15 losses and no draw.
YOUR lowest rating.
my rating has been so low that it could have walked under a rattlesnake wearing a ten gallon hat.!!
Well i Had once 637 in bullet and then reached 1553 in bullet,yesterday only :P
echecs06 wrote:
dunno
What DO you know?
Sep 22, 2010
0
#11
woodshover wrote:
echecs06 wrote:
dunno
What DO you know?
I dont know many things , but i know a tie is an inverted noose that will hang a man if he's not careful
Kacparov wrote:
1200
That should be true for about half the people here... Depending on their first game or two.
I had 1050 or so right after I joined.. mainly because I resigned a few games early against higher rated players whereas the lower rated ones I was beating wanted to drag it out to the very end...
Mithras wrote:
woodshover wrote:
echecs06 wrote:
dunno
What DO you know?
I don't know many things , but i know a tie is an inverted noose that will hang a man if he's not careful
Brilliant?
Sep 22, 2010
0
#16
woodshover wrote:
Mithras wrote:
woodshover wrote:
echecs06 wrote:
dunno
What DO you know?
I don't know many things , but i know a tie is an inverted noose that will hang a man if he's not careful
Brilliant?
maybe not brilliant , more like "Whoa thats deep dude"
packs suitcase to go and stay in another 3star hotel
wormrose wrote: ...One of the reasons I don't play here anymore is the wild fluctuations in my rating due to the RD. So I play where they use Elo.
If you don't like having a RD, you can always play where they use the Ego system. That's where your rating = your Ego.
Sep 22, 2010
0
#18
Niven42 wrote:
wormrose wrote: ...One of the reasons I don't play here anymore is the wild fluctuations in my rating due to the RD. So I play where they use Elo.
If you don't like having a RD, you can always play where they use the Ego system. That's where your rating = your Ego.
Absolutely, my ego... I mean my rating... is all there is. Without it, I am nothing. My life has no meaning. And nobody else cares about ratings except me. I'm the only one. That's why nobody ever starts any forum topics about ratings and that's why nobody ever reads them... or ever respondes to them. Ratings don't mean a thing. A person should never engage in a rated chess game. That's too arrogant. And those complex mathematical formulas to determine the rating... they are meaningless and useless... a waste of time and money. The only reason we have ratings is so that we have something to put people down for noticing. It's always fun to put people down... a great way to pump up your ego.
I fell slightly below 1200 in live-standard and online chess when I first came. Then I studied tactics :D
What is the lowest rating you've ever had on chess.com?