Lyudmil Tsvetkov

Sort:
stewardjandstewardj
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:

Couple more games.

I am in such a bad form, that I am only able to win handicaps from SF, not a single win with the full set yet.

And you want me to play OTB and online.

If I can not beat SF, how will I beat other players then?

People who have not read my article on Fischer, might do so: https://www.expert-chess-strategies.com/learning-chess-for-advanced-chess-players.html

 

StockFish is unbeatable. ACCEPT IT!!!!!!!! There is not A SINGLE PERSON IN THE WORLD that can beat it, so stop trying, cause you are not the best person in the world, and the actual best person in the world CAN beat it.

Also, you have changed your story from "Both StockFish and AlphaZero are SOOOO weak! I could beat them easily!" to "I can't beat StockFish without a handicap."

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
stewardjandstewardj wrote:
Duck-Season wrote:

I do not understand how this turned into a form of witch hunt.

Mr. Tsvetkov is a former diplomat , therefor we can not fault his character . (So, you're saying that diplomats are somehow perfect in character?!)

He gave up his career to focus on analyzing chess and working on chess engines.

He helped develop Stockfish no less. (No, he simply commented about games that he seemingly played against SF, but is probably fake for reasons discussed a billion times)

He is practically a chess god (So, you have fallen to his hypnotizing trap of ludicrous claims with no proof, haven't you?)

 

I leave you with this part of a review:

In the last couple of years he has been very active in contributing to develop
Stockfish (he probably didn't even contact the developers of StockFish, much less actually help develop it), the strongest chess engine on Earth (yep, you fell for his trap).
In 2017, he published The Secret of Chess, a ground-breaking work, exploring
unchartered territories of chess knowledge (although groundbreaking, it's not much. it's probably about as groundbreaking to the chess community as the Pillow Pet is to the pillow industry...)

2 IMs and 1 GM say the book is good, innovative and revolutionary.

Who are you to say the opposite?

My contributions to SF have been documented and I have posted multiple times about that.

Who are you to deny that?

Yes, diplomats should be trusted more than UHOs(unidentified human objects).

stewardjandstewardj
GWTR wrote:
pretzel2 wrote:

first you claim to be stronger than carlsen, now you claim you've written the only book worth reading. you're either delusional or one of the most persistent trolls i've ever seen. bye.

... or he's (unfortunately) been fighting "fire with fire."

You understand people come on here and (unprofessionally) call him things like "delusional"?

I wouldn't call him delusional, but I wouldn't be surprised if he weren't delusional. He is definitely one of the following:

  • delusional, such as what pretzel described him as
  • ignorant
  • stupid
  • a troll
  • lying
  • stubborn
  • maybe someone hacked into his account to say this kind of stuff, not likely, but more likely than him being the best player in the world
I suspect you are 2-3 of these things on the list
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov

SF is beatable, I am just not in good form now.

When I get into my best form, I will wipe the floor with SF.

EscherehcsE
DeirdreSkye wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:

SF is beatable, I am just not in good form now.

When I get into my best form, I will wipe the floor with SF.

Sure you will.

If you have  10-20 minutes spare time , find the cure for cancer please. 

He's already done that; He wrote a book about it. Unfortunately, nobody will buy the book.

stewardjandstewardj
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
DeirdreSkye wrote:
GWTR wrote:
pretzel2 wrote:

first you claim to be stronger than carlsen, now you claim you've written the only book worth reading. you're either delusional or one of the most persistent trolls i've ever seen. bye.

... or he's (unfortunately) been fighting "fire with fire."

You understand people come on here and (unprofessionally) call him things like "delusional"?

You are very confused but that hardly surprises anyone.

First he said a bunch of nonsense  then I(and others) called him delusional.

     The first big nonsense he said was that Kasparov was actually weak and that he learns 5 times better wIth Stockfish than if he studied with him!That was only 2 days after he created his account.Then he continued calling all GMs today , even Carlsen , weak and claiming that only he knows the real secret of chess.

            There was no "fire" back then.He started it.

Another lie.

I published a good book and spread the word.

Then some trolls appeared, who did not read the book but accused me of something.

Had they read the book, there would be no altercations.

Bud they did not.

This 'Secret of Chess' thread was quiet for quite some time, so the 2 days statement is further lying.

Lyudmil, from what I see, is not the one that started the fire. Us people criticized him first. Lyudmil, however, WAS the person to set a bajillion candles on the ground in a room of a couple hundred people. What I'm basically saying, Lyudmil, you didn't start the fire, but you pretty much caused it. Us "trolls" aren't trolls intending to knock down all of the candles, but it's going to happen. And we do it for a good reason too. Why wouldn't we? We're fighting fire with water, but you somehow magically have some sort of magical substance that keeps the fire going. Most people call it ignorance.

hitthepin
# 206

What do you mean? My viewpoint hasn’t changed.
hitthepin
@stewardjandstewardj is correct. We criticized Lyudmil first, asking for his credentials. He insulted us in response, and things kind of got out of hand from there.
stewardjandstewardj
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
Logan-Paul wrote:

STOP FIGHTING WITH MY BOI LYUDMIL

HIS TIPS ARE REALLY GOOD!

 

I am not fighting, I am the ONLY one posting some chess positions here.

If everyone would discuss, this would be a great thread.

Skirmishing is easier though.

You're the one that laid out a blanket of candles, not us

stewardjandstewardj
EscherehcsE wrote:
DeirdreSkye wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:

SF is beatable, I am just not in good form now.

When I get into my best form, I will wipe the floor with SF.

Sure you will.

If you have  10-20 minutes spare time , find the cure for cancer please. 

He's already done that; He wrote a book about it. Unfortunately, nobody will buy the book.

XD

stewardjandstewardj

Lyumdmil, are you trolling us? Because you have to be either really stubborn, ignorant, foolish, or outright delusional to not be a troll!

pretzel2

i'm the guy that doesn't claim to be better than carlsen, or claim to be 3500, or have sock puppets promoting the sale of a book. that's who i am. who are you tevetkov? you make the two claims, and don't have any evidence whatever to back them up. who are you to make claims like this and just expect people to believe you? 

chesster3145
hitthepin wrote:
@stewardjandstewardj is correct. We criticized Lyudmil first, asking for his credentials. He insulted us in response, and things kind of got out of hand from there.

I wouldn't call asking for credentials criticism, or at least not any kind of unfair criticism.

Iam2busy
Logan-Paul wrote:

STOP FIGHTING WITH MY BOI LYUDMIL

HIS TIPS ARE REALLY GOOD!

Typical Lyudmil supporter behaviour.

odaa71
Hi
GWTR
stewardjandstewardj wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
DeirdreSkye wrote:
GWTR wrote:
pretzel2 wrote:

first you claim to be stronger than carlsen, now you claim you've written the only book worth reading. you're either delusional or one of the most persistent trolls i've ever seen. bye.

... or he's (unfortunately) been fighting "fire with fire."

You understand people come on here and (unprofessionally) call him things like "delusional"?

You are very confused but that hardly surprises anyone.

First he said a bunch of nonsense  then I(and others) called him delusional.

     The first big nonsense he said was that Kasparov was actually weak and that he learns 5 times better wIth Stockfish than if he studied with him!That was only 2 days after he created his account.Then he continued calling all GMs today , even Carlsen , weak and claiming that only he knows the real secret of chess.

            There was no "fire" back then.He started it.

Another lie.

I published a good book and spread the word.

Then some trolls appeared, who did not read the book but accused me of something.

Had they read the book, there would be no altercations.

Bud they did not.

This 'Secret of Chess' thread was quiet for quite some time, so the 2 days statement is further lying.

Lyudmil, from what I see, is not the one that started the fire. Us people criticized him first. Lyudmil, however, WAS the person to set a bajillion candles on the ground in a room of a couple hundred people. What I'm basically saying, Lyudmil, you didn't start the fire, but you pretty much caused it. Us "trolls" aren't trolls intending to knock down all of the candles, but it's going to happen. And we do it for a good reason too. Why wouldn't we? We're fighting fire with water, but you somehow magically have some sort of magical substance that keeps the fire going. Most people call it ignorance.

So your defense is also (please read in Eric Cartman's voice) "But mommmmm, LT started it"?

 

Is The Secret of Happiness (get it?evil.png) writing negative comments about the same person over and over and over on a chess message board??

 

Would you like to play a 5-day move game of chess?  I hear it can be fun sometime ...

GWTR
odaa71 wrote:
Hi

Hello

GWTR
pretzel2 wrote:

i'm the guy that doesn't claim to be better than carlsen, or claim to be 3500, or have sock puppets promoting the sale of a book. that's who i am. who are you tevetkov? you make the two claims, and don't have any evidence whatever to back them up. who are you to make claims like this and just expect people to believe you? 

What you are, Mr. King, is a NM?!  That's cool!

Iam2busy

Okay. What if I told you that I was better than everyone at swimming, even Michael Phelps?

And that you should pay me for swimming classes?

Would you trust me? If not, what would you do?

Would you ask me to show you?

And what if I refused to swim in the pool because there were "too many people" inside?

stewardjandstewardj
chesster3145 wrote:
hitthepin wrote:
@stewardjandstewardj is correct. We criticized Lyudmil first, asking for his credentials. He insulted us in response, and things kind of got out of hand from there.

I wouldn't call asking for credentials criticism, or at least not any kind of unfair criticism.

I wouldn't either. I was referring to us attacking him after we realized he probably didn't have any credentials besides his book.