Magnus Carlsen is an embarrassment

That's mean!

That's the truth. Some are afraid of it.

If your so good then show up at the WC. If you draw a game then "haha guess you made a joke of yourself"

Who won the tiebreak again??

well the bunny still maintains carlsen is an embracement not an embarrassment.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/magnus-carlsen-is-an-embracement

So does the cat

I haven't watched any computer games. Come to think of it, I dont know of anyone that has ever watched a whole computer game either. It's just too boring. Sort of like the last world chess championship. I'm sure it was exciting to some people, but very boring to people who dont care for computer-like games.

If you check out some games, you might change your opinion, exchange sacrifices are not uncommon.

BontheCat, we've learned a few things about you here: 1. You're a weak chess player. 2. You know nothing about chess history. 3. When people actually educate you on data-based topics you espouse uninformed opinions on, rather than being a mature, reasonable, intelligent adult, you proceed to make insults towards the person. It just isn't any fun to talk to an 80 IQ autistic weak chess player, who is bound to be an an overweight, middle-aged person who no one cares about, specifically not on the topic of chess knowledge or information.

I pointed out you knew nothing about the Kasparov-Karpov matches. Because, duh, you're an 80 IQ autistic loser on the internet not above 1200 strength. It refuted your point, and you described it as "irrelevant" due to having no argument. In fact, it was relevant because it directly proved your statement wrong and also made it clear you know nothing about the topic you were discussing. It made you look stupid, uninformed, and like your IQ is below 70. It's the same with everything you've written. You have extremely strong beliefs based on no data whatsoever, some people correct you and inform you of the data and even though your brain doesn't work and you're 1200 because of your dysfunctional brain, you proceed to insult the people who actually factually corrected you. And your only response is something a person with a functioning adult brain wouldn't be stupid enough to allow themselves to type, "Durrr, you lost your toys, that's why you factually correct me and expose me as a loser who knows nothing about chess."

Here's BontheCat's 80 IQ brain in action: "I got busted as a weak chess player. Okay, let's lie and make up an event that didn't happen and use that as evidence that I'm a strong player. That will prove to this strong player that I'm smart and have owned him." What kind of brain damage do you have? In what kind of messed up brain is this a smart response?

Factually correcting a stupid, weak player isn't trolling. It's helping the community. You pretending to have an idea about any of these topics is in fact trolling, especially when you're repeatedly insulting people who aren't stupid or weak or uninformed about statistics and chess history.

Botvinnik4Ever and hartofgoldrubinstein: Maaaw, ad hominem attacks. The only thing left once you've bumped your head into hard facts too many times. I'll chalk that up as an easy win against mssrs D. Fault and Walk Over.

Wise move

Amazing how this discussion continous eve after Carlsen reaching 2875 elo

Magnus Carlson should be stripped of his title. He is an embarrassment.

People make mistakes and embarrass themselves all the time.   No need to get excited about it.  Embrace the embarrassment.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/magnus-carlsen-is-an-embracement

And speaking of staples ...

I'm starting to sense a (imaginary) love-hate relationship going on between Carlsen and his self-proclaimed enemies. They must realize by now that he's practically the only reason to even bother logging on at this point.

It's a fascinating connection: No chess skill, no chess knowledge, but, for whatever reason, extreme arrogance and certainty on every topic. All the product of having a horrifically low level of intelligence. It's always a weird combination of being stupid, bad at chess, unsuccessful in life, and unable to be successful socially. It's interesting to observe BonTheCat fulfill all of this to a T. And, most amazingly, he is simply too stupid to observe how stupid he looks and even comprehend how badly he's embarrassing himself due to his unbelievably low intelligence. This is a sign of autism: when you can't even see socially how stupid and retarded you're making yourself look. It's so strange to see angry, uninformed, autistic 1100s insulting good chess players who know what they're talking about. The world would be a much better place without these braindead losers like Bon. The first person celebrating would be his mom. She'd be dancing on his grave and say, "Woohoo! The unlovable low income welfare recipient finally doesn't need to be supported anymore!"

Thanks for me making me laugh out loud, Botvinnik4Ever! Your rants are absolutely priceless!

Carlsen is a smart man. He’s also not very competitive. Not everyone’s Bobby Fischer and that’s a good thing. Carlsen’s not as arrogant, inconsiderate, or as competitive as Fischer. They’re both great players who had/have their own good & bad qualities about them. Just remember that chess isn’t all about confidence and competition. 

You speak of him like he is a murderer

There are things more troubling than murder.