magnus carlsen is an amazing player. that's that. he can do whatever he wants.
Magnus Carlsen is an embarrassment
Sort:
I don't really see what's wrong with it, after all you're still gonna be retaining the world champion title anyway
Embarrasing indeed
Aug 8, 2020
0
#685
mINdFlaYeR8 wrote:
I don't really see what's wrong with it, after all you're still gonna be retaining the world champion title anyway
The problem is that he was paid a million dollars to play the match, and with that comes the responsibility of playing to the best of his ability, and when he refused to do that I’m sorry but that’s unacceptable.
@CedarEater , be specific. (Just wanna know what u mean)
Magnus has no responsibility to play the best he can. His responsibility was to try and win the match.
[and that is what he did]
no. that. greece offers ESL courses in their major cities...for those in need.
ha you know how Fischer and Kasparov will play in nowadays? They will play for more accuracy because of the computer analysis , it's most likely that they will be less aggressive styles if they want to succeed in modern chess, so you never know what they will be doing in this situation
Oct 22, 2020
0
#690
Art0fArcane wrote:
I know for a fact that stronk soviet leftist Kasparov would’ve crushed fabi like the soviets crushed fascist Germany.
Yes, and Kasparov would’ve beaten Carlsen probably 9-4 or so. Magnus Carlsen is the weakest world champion in the history of the game
Oct 22, 2020
0
#691
staples13 wrote:
Art0fArcane wrote:
I know for a fact that stronk soviet leftist Kasparov would’ve crushed fabi like the soviets crushed fascist Germany.
Yes, and Kasparov would’ve beaten Carlsen probably 9-4 or so. Magnus Carlsen is the weakest world champion in the history of the game
I guess that's how it works... if you lose to the weakest world champion in history then you're the new weakest world champ... the only strange thing is why you think Kasparov is the weakest.
staples13 a écrit :
Art0fArcane wrote:
I know for a fact that stronk soviet leftist Kasparov would’ve crushed fabi like the soviets crushed fascist Germany.
Yes, and Kasparov would’ve beaten Carlsen probably 9-4 or so. Magnus Carlsen is the weakest world champion in the history of the game
hes still young
Oct 22, 2020
0
#694
What I think we can all agree on is that we are in the weakest era in the history of chess. Magnus Carlsen, Nakamura, Caruana, So, all would be destroyed by Fischer, Kasparov, capablanca, Morphy.
Oct 22, 2020
0
#695
staples13 wrote:
What I think we can all agree on is that we are in the weakest era in the history of chess. Magnus Carlsen, Nakamura, Caruana, So, all would be destroyed by Fischer, Kasparov, capablanca, Morphy.
Why do you think that?
so not true
emchel wrote:
staples13 wrote:
What I think we can all agree on is that we are in the weakest era in the history of chess. Magnus Carlsen, Nakamura, Caruana, So, all would be destroyed by Fischer, Kasparov, capablanca, Morphy.
Why do you think that?
Actually we are in the strongest era I believe
This original post was ignorant nonsense, and should have been ignored. Just some big-talking patter pretending to be tough
ninja888 wrote:
emchel wrote:
staples13 wrote:
What I think we can all agree on is that we are in the weakest era in the history of chess. Magnus Carlsen, Nakamura, Caruana, So, all would be destroyed by Fischer, Kasparov, capablanca, Morphy.
Why do you think that?
Actually we are in the strongest era I believe
me too
You know that Caruana also agreed to the draws? Shouldn’t we also be ashamed of him?
Caruana had a much worse position and was playing as black. Also he is not the world champion.
Are you insane? Caruana played White in Game 12. Whatever little credibility you have has flown out the window, @staples13.