magnus carlsen= u.s open

Nakamura is the kind of player Magnus likes kicking in the butt in all possible ways. Their last game should be censored- it falls into the category of hard porn.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1705534

Humiliating, to say the very least.

but you know its hard to play players you lost to, you know sometimes even if you are better you could still lose because of that. I dont know about Kamsky too much to be honest, but i think Alex Yermolinsky ones said: We cant defend passivly, you can only defend passivly if your name is Kamsky lol

Firebrand i just realised you might have said something similar though less nice, i have a slight reading problem.

The reason Naka can't play against Carlsen is very simple: Carlsen is way superior as a player, under any aspect.

I also agree with FireBrandX that Kamsky is of higher quality as a player than Naka- this is apparent. The reason they are on par, factly Naka being a bit higher rated, is that Kamsky does little work on his chess since a long time ago, while Naka is the typical case of a high-level engine boy.

what you mean of high level engine boy? 

Anyway it also could be that Naka plays faster then Carlsens and just plays too careless.

Isn't it apparent what high level engine boy means?

Forget "faster" or "slower". To put it simply, Naka just can't play against Magnus, because he's is not up to that level- plain and simple. Only Kramnik could possibly put some resistance against Magnus, although he would have an extremely hard time.

Yes but i mean Magnus always played strongest player for decades, Nakamura also met some  strong players but in general he easily crushed many opponents. Its not so easy to adjust, also not to mention he has a slight disadvantage because he already now lost to Magnus Carlsens what maybe alters his play . 

Well i dont know so much about chess, But i guess maybe we see really big form Nakamura in the future.

Naka will win a match against Carlsen they day pigs fly. Nuff said.

Well you know more about chess then me, but i honestly believe Nakamura has the potential to beat Carlsens if he really wants it. 

Also pfren how likely is that you win against Nakamura?

Not likely at all, but I could have a dim chance.

Against Carlsen- bah, forget it.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1565475.

You evil monsters, you had me doubt Nakamura. 

That's a blitz game, in case you didn't notice, sir.

Nakamura at his best is at the same level as Carlsen.

Based on? Can you show a tournament from the last 3 years with this version of Nakamura vs Carlsen?

He sees just as deeply. This was displayed at London 2012 when he managed to get a draw in a very complex endgame.

 Nakamura is one of the most overrated GMs. He is more of a 2600 player. Not to mention the silly stuff on his tweeter...

So he's as strong based on getting a draw in one game? Whereas he hasn't had a single tournament when Carlsen hasn't outperformed him since Carlsen has been an adult?

Outplayed him? Nakamura is not some patzer. He is at the same level as Carlsen.

Let's see how Nakamura improves after getting lessons from Kasparov.

How is he at the same level when Carlsen's rating is >100 points higher and he beats him at every tournament?

And I didn't call Nakamura a patzer.

Is this a joke? He is still defeating the best players in the word, unless you consider the likes of Caruana, Ivanchuk, and Anand as 2600's.