No Magnus Carlsen Thats who Im talking bout who every chess player have fear for not me i will and can beat him if i play him in a seven game series
Magnus Carlsen
Sort:
Magnet Carlsen right.
goldendog wrote:
You're thinking of Magnet Carlsen. Yeah he's terrible.
I think you mean repulsive.
TheGrobe wrote:
goldendog wrote:
You're thinking of Magnet Carlsen. Yeah he's terrible.
I think you mean repulsive.
lol
No body have the confidence in themselves to say they can be him thats sad
Jul 14, 2009
0
#27
I suppose you also think it's sad that I don't think I can jump over the Empire State Building in a single leap?
No Ask yourself the same question.
Jul 14, 2009
0
#29
NOLAUPT wrote:
No Ask yourself the same question.
What? If by this you mean to ask myself whether it's sad that I think I can't jump over the Empire State Building, of course it isn't sad. It's also not sad that I don't think I can beat Magnus Carlsen in a game of chess. It's reality.
BlackWaive wrote:
There are people on this site who are better than grandmasters. Surely they can beat Carlsen in an online match.
I wouldn't go that far now... lol.
Reality is you sad in chess LOL? Im just trying to keep the forums busy with info and people thoughts thats it, but any way he is not the Best
Jul 14, 2009
0
#32
NOLAUPT wrote:
Reality is you sad in chess LOL? Im just trying to keep the forums busy with info and people thoughts thats it, but any way he is not the Best
Chess is a game of logic. Saying a 1084 rated player (your rating) could beat a player rated 2772 in a chess match is not logical. This helps to prove you are partly illogical, thus, maybe chess and chess.com does not suit you. Go fish seems more up your alley.
Ill bust your ass lets play fool
Jul 15, 2009
0
#34
I don't even think Kasparov can beat him...much less some "patzers" on an internet chess site.cause that's what we are to him..."patzers".yes,even the titled players.
TheGrobe wrote:
goldendog wrote:
You're thinking of Magnet Carlsen. Yeah he's terrible.
I think you mean repulsive.
har har har
NOLAUPT - I never read anything more stupid than your posts. To say that you with your poor play (I looked at your games, not only at your rating) can beat the future world champion - I just recently asked GM Bareev, super-elite chess player, who assisted Kramnik when he beat Kasparov, about how about in 3 years Carlsen will be world champion - he said yes, very possible. The highest rated GM on this site has FIDE rating about 2600, OK, maybe if he is very lucky he can draw with Carlsen.
Rofl a person rated 1088 thinks he can take on a super GM...hahahha
BTW ALL OF YOU ARE WRONG! OF COURSE SOMEONE ON CHESS.COM CAN BEAT MAGNUS CARLSEN! examples: pelger (2906 peak rating), Nostradamus70 (matches up with Rybka 3 a lot more than Carlsen can hope to), and ouachita (beat Bent Larsen)
Jul 15, 2009
0
#38
bobobbob wrote:
Rofl a person rated 1088 thinks he can take on a super GM...hahahha
BTW ALL OF YOU ARE WRONG! OF COURSE SOMEONE ON CHESS.COM CAN BEAT MAGNUS CARLSEN! examples: pelger (2906 peak rating), Nostradamus70 (matches up with Rybka 3 a lot more than Carlsen can hope to), and ouachita (beat Bent Larsen)
Indeeed I'd assume there are a handful that could beat Carlsen in an online match. OTB he'd trash everybody though :D
bobobbob wrote:
Nostradamus70 (matches up with Rybka 3 a lot more than Carlsen can hope to)
Yeah... 100% is rather a lot, isn't it? I wonder why that could be...
*Hum de hum de hum*
He can be beat in a chess match not fighting