"Magnus LOSES and Then Accuses!?!?!?" - Chess Forums - Page 2

Morkar_the_Northman · 2023-11-29T02:10:06-08:00

I'd like to know why it that the esteemed Norwegian Jarl, Sir Magness Carl, gets away accusing (or hinting at) his opponents of cheating, each time he's destroyed by his colleagues. Both Niemann and Suleymenov were proven innocent in their respective tournaments, and yet hardly anyone even

cheemsburger9000

Dec 12, 2023

0

#21

I am finally convinced, thank you

darlihysa

Dec 12, 2023

0

#22

Carlsen it is a reincarnation of great Lasker!! It happens to all the breakdown or the delusion at middleage!! Nakamura failed to pass this downfall and has started to make blunders or playing along positional style! Carlsen is next to falling down from his star!! Will he win again??!

Morkar_the_Northman

Dec 12, 2023

0

#23

Sir S. Tangsa: The chap was framed, dude! Instead of being the man that beat Magnus, the poor fellow is now known as the guy that wore a watch against him!

SavageOppress

Dec 12, 2023

0

#24

Hans_GOAT_Niemann wrote:

I don't think you read my answer because I started off by admitting that he didn't actually accuse him.

Yet you titled the thread "Magnus loses and then accuses" and said he was hinting that his opponent was cheating.